This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to know what I still need to do to get it to FA standard.
Thanks, ChrisTheDude ( talk) 21:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Finetooth comments: This generally reads well, seems comprehensive, and is adequately illustrated, stable, neutral, and well-supported. A few of the sentences have too many clauses strung together and would be more clear if divided. I've listed four of these below with suggestions for possible re-casting.
Composition and recording
Music and lyrics
Promotion and accolades
Critical reception
Images
I hope these brief comments prove helpful. If so, please consider reviewing another article, especially one from the PR backlog. That is where I found this one. Finetooth ( talk) 05:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to know what I still need to do to get it to FA standard.
Thanks, ChrisTheDude ( talk) 21:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Finetooth comments: This generally reads well, seems comprehensive, and is adequately illustrated, stable, neutral, and well-supported. A few of the sentences have too many clauses strung together and would be more clear if divided. I've listed four of these below with suggestions for possible re-casting.
Composition and recording
Music and lyrics
Promotion and accolades
Critical reception
Images
I hope these brief comments prove helpful. If so, please consider reviewing another article, especially one from the PR backlog. That is where I found this one. Finetooth ( talk) 05:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)