Apple Inc.
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to see it reach Good Article status. Please let us know if it does not meet that criteria, and if so, where.
Thanks, Cg2916 ( talk) 17:16, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. I'd be happy to do this peer review. Can you (Cg2916) confirm that you are still interested in the PR and willing to work on the article ... I ask because it looks like you haven't edited in a couple of weeks. --
Noleander (
talk)
23:13, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hmmm, it looks like you have not edited the article much. The Peer Review process is primarily for editors that have been working on an article, and want to work on it some more, and are asking for ideas. My advice to you is to spend a week or two (about 40 to 100 edits) improving the article, then come to the PR process for assistance. Does that make sense? -- Noleander ( talk) 23:15, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Apple Inc.
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to see it reach Good Article status. Please let us know if it does not meet that criteria, and if so, where.
Thanks, Cg2916 ( talk) 17:16, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. I'd be happy to do this peer review. Can you (Cg2916) confirm that you are still interested in the PR and willing to work on the article ... I ask because it looks like you haven't edited in a couple of weeks. --
Noleander (
talk)
23:13, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hmmm, it looks like you have not edited the article much. The Peer Review process is primarily for editors that have been working on an article, and want to work on it some more, and are asking for ideas. My advice to you is to spend a week or two (about 40 to 100 edits) improving the article, then come to the PR process for assistance. Does that make sense? -- Noleander ( talk) 23:15, 16 November 2012 (UTC)