This peer review discussion has been closed.
We have here a series of seven articles which are all, in essence, subarticles of
Saxophone. What I would like to know (because of course there's no featured-topic potential here :D
) is how editors think these articles should relate to the main
saxophone article. What should be included on each page? What should repeated from the main article? What shoudl not be duplicated? Comments on the parallel
peer review for saxophone would also be greatly appreciated.
Happy‑
melon
19:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
We have here a series of seven articles which are all, in essence, subarticles of
Saxophone. What I would like to know (because of course there's no featured-topic potential here :D
) is how editors think these articles should relate to the main
saxophone article. What should be included on each page? What should repeated from the main article? What shoudl not be duplicated? Comments on the parallel
peer review for saxophone would also be greatly appreciated.
Happy‑
melon
19:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)