Toolbox |
---|
![]() | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because…
I'd like to get some feedback about the general article. I'm thinking about nominating it for GA, and this is the first article I've really written. All feedback/constructive criticism is welcome.
Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 09:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Heh, ok.....will jot some notes Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 22:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
It arose from a disagreement between the state of North Carolina and the other members of the Southeast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact over the funding for the project.What is "the project"? Is it the "Southeast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact"? I didn't find that clear the first time I read it. I think you need to briefly describe the Compact the first time it's named.
- Colin M ( talk) 03:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
skepticalof it? I'll try to add more about the oral arguments, decision, and aftermath. Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 05:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
It was run by a Commission, which was tasked.... There, and in all subsequent uses, it seems like it's being used as a common noun, in which case capitalizing does not make sense. It could make sense to capitalize it it's being used as an abbreviated form of a particular named entity (e.g. 'The Radioactive Waste Management Commission' or whatever), but no such entity is named in the article. And even then, I'd want to think about it some more and double-check the WP:MOS. For example, I checked the article on the 9/11 Commission and it mostly doesn't capitalize commission when it appears alone. Same with the word organization in the articles on UNESCO and World Health Organization. Colin M ( talk) 15:44, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
![]() | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because…
I'd like to get some feedback about the general article. I'm thinking about nominating it for GA, and this is the first article I've really written. All feedback/constructive criticism is welcome.
Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 09:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Heh, ok.....will jot some notes Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 22:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
It arose from a disagreement between the state of North Carolina and the other members of the Southeast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact over the funding for the project.What is "the project"? Is it the "Southeast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact"? I didn't find that clear the first time I read it. I think you need to briefly describe the Compact the first time it's named.
- Colin M ( talk) 03:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
skepticalof it? I'll try to add more about the oral arguments, decision, and aftermath. Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 05:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
It was run by a Commission, which was tasked.... There, and in all subsequent uses, it seems like it's being used as a common noun, in which case capitalizing does not make sense. It could make sense to capitalize it it's being used as an abbreviated form of a particular named entity (e.g. 'The Radioactive Waste Management Commission' or whatever), but no such entity is named in the article. And even then, I'd want to think about it some more and double-check the WP:MOS. For example, I checked the article on the 9/11 Commission and it mostly doesn't capitalize commission when it appears alone. Same with the word organization in the articles on UNESCO and World Health Organization. Colin M ( talk) 15:44, 19 March 2019 (UTC)