This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it offers a fascinating study of the strange yet intriguing history of a distinctive American opera.
Thanks, Ecoleetage ( talk) 21:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: An interesting, if very short, article. Here are some suggestions for improvement:
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it offers a fascinating study of the strange yet intriguing history of a distinctive American opera.
Thanks, Ecoleetage ( talk) 21:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: An interesting, if very short, article. Here are some suggestions for improvement:
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC)