This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because the article recently passed
GA, and I'm hoping to submit it for
FAC at some point in the near future. There are currently not any
tornado outbreak articles that have been promoted to
FA, so there isn't a clear cut definition of how an article like this needs to setup to be FA-worthy. (There has been one candidate that I know of, but it was
not promoted.) I think the two things I'm looking for the most are:
Thanks, WxGopher ( talk) 03:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Ealdgyth ( talk · contribs)
Comments from Wackymacs ( talk · contribs):
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because the article recently passed
GA, and I'm hoping to submit it for
FAC at some point in the near future. There are currently not any
tornado outbreak articles that have been promoted to
FA, so there isn't a clear cut definition of how an article like this needs to setup to be FA-worthy. (There has been one candidate that I know of, but it was
not promoted.) I think the two things I'm looking for the most are:
Thanks, WxGopher ( talk) 03:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Ealdgyth ( talk · contribs)
Comments from Wackymacs ( talk · contribs):