Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs) per WP:CSD#G7 (author requested deletion). -- RL0919 ( talk) 22:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/What a Tropical Cyclone Is Not

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/What a Tropical Cyclone Is Not ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unnecessary joke page - seems like a clear case of WP:NOT. Part of a pattern of joke pages from this editor. MikeWazowski ( talk) 17:41, 25 July 2011 (UTC) reply

not a joke page. This is advice to TC page editors/creators.  --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Keeping the skies bright Chat Me Up 17:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Keep unless the project says that they don't want it. It doesn't look like the purpose of the page is entirely humourous and it is for the project to decide what pages they do and do not want. Hut 8.5 17:59, 25 July 2011 (UTC) change to Delete since the project evidently doesn't want it. Hut 8.5 10:42, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply
I don't think the project even knew it existed - I've now notified them of this discussion, tho. MikeWazowski ( talk) 18:33, 25 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - WPTC project member - Do we really need this? Some of the facts he has put down are wrong, eg: There will never be another TC named Katrina or Wilma after the Atlantic versions of 2005 as there was another Wilma earlier this year. There is a lot of stuff there that we do not need written down as it is common sense eg "A tropical cyclone is not a blizzard". Jason Rees ( talk) 19:51, 25 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Delete While boldness is good, there has to be a community benefit for pages to exist in the Wikipedia namespace (or in other namespaces, for that matter). We are here to build the encyclopedia, not to create unclear essays. Johnuniq ( talk) 00:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Of very, very limited use. I'm not one of the "guys" (apparently the hurricane folk are guys), mind you, but it seems they have spoken clearly. And there are dozens of redirects attached to this page. All this is taking up too much server space. Drmies ( talk) 00:56, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Just delete period - This is an eyesore. No one but the editor who made it has an interest in it. Plus it has absolutely no encyclopedic value. As for the user in question, accusing people of personal attacks with absolutely no evidence is rather incivil. Strange Passerby didn't accuse you of stupidity. You've implied it that way, but Strange Passerby did not outright call you stupid. Mitch32( Can someone turn on the damn air conditioning?) 18:22, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Objection to userfying - Why should this exist period, Wikipedia namespace or Userspace? This has no encyclopedic value and considering the editor in question here seems to be getting less civil, writing in disruptive text (which really should be removed by an uninvolved admin). This is a joke page. I am a fan of WP:BJAODN, but this should be somewhere like that, not in userspace. It has no value and why this is still open is beyond me.Mitch32( Can someone turn on the damn air conditioning?) 21:41, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
    • If I'm serious, it's not a joke page I am serious, so it is not a joke page. It is a serious attempt at advice.  --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Keeping skies bright Chat Me Up 16:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC) reply
      • There is a very large dose of IDIDNTHEARTHAT here. Wikipedia is not a personal website where people store stuff that interests them. Everything (whether user space or not) is supposed to help the encyclopedia. Just consider all of the time from independent editors that is being wasted in this outbreak of nonsense—that alone should cause any collaborative editor to immediately desist and to ask for all their inappropriate pages to be removed. Johnuniq ( talk) 00:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Delete anyway. Moving it to userspace is just sweeping it under the rug and pretending it doesn't exist. If we don't want it, we don't want it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 00:12, 28 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Listen, guys, there are some important things here which are often misconceived. Not a Coastal Storm, Not a tornado, Not a tsunami, Not a Nor'Easter, Not Always Tropical, Not a Point, and Does Not Turn This, That, or the Other Way are all common myths and misconceptions which put people's lives in danger all the time. This is a guide to all of the misconceptions which are not true. It isn't a joke, It isn't nonsense, It isn't wrong, It isn't inappropriate, It is the difference between life and death. I am sorry if one or two users thought it was a joke, I am sorry if the tone mad too much light of the subject, but it is about discrediting misconceptions. You guys, having an interest in WPTC, can understand those issues, right? Everybody in the field has run into one of those internet idiots who thinks that landfall is required for damage; or that severe damage is limited to the coast; or that the storms all go this way or that and miss them; or that living in New York City somehow makes them safe. Those people have a dangerous misguided complacency which is as life threatening as the storm itself. A few of the other ones are just advice for article writers, but the list I have given here (also on the page in question) is life and death information. Saving the life of a well-informed person is easy. Saving the life of an ignorant one is not. If ignorant, TC-uneducated lives mean anything to this project, then this is not inappropriate. If those people mean anything to this project, then just leave it be in my userspace.  --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Keeping skies bright Chat Me Up 01:50, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply

I have never heard someone mistake a tropical cyclone for a tsunami or Nor'Easter. And I've never met someone who think they just reverse course in the opposite direction. Who exactly are you planning on saving? There's plenty of information on the page Hurricane as well as resources such as the National Hurricane Center that do this. No offense, but I doubt anybody is going to link to your "evacuated" page as a guide to understanding tropical systems. Inks.LWC ( talk) 06:21, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply
"Is Not a Tsunami" is about people who think that the storm surge is the only thing which can completely destroy a house, and is the opposite of "Is Not a Tornado". "Is Not a Nor'Easter" is about the difference between "landfall" and "direct hit" and even "indirect hit" and how any of the above can be very severe. "Does Not Turn This, That, or the Other Way" is about all of the people in places like Savannah, GA; Pensacola, FL; Washington, DC; and (formerly) New Orleans, LA who have had dangerous urban myths, logical fallacies, and complacency sown in by a few years without a TC strike. And, frankly, the I've had to rm that they form "almost exclusively in the tropical regions", which supports the idea that a TC is always tropical, to replace it with "often in the tropical regions". The TC article is very good, but it does not have what it needs for this, a misconceptions section and a full sweep for removing misconceptions. As for who's gonna see it, I don't know, but the same is true of any user-essay. The point is it is not inappropriate nor a joke. It is really about discrediting all of those misconceptions.  --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Keeping skies bright Chat Me Up 13:03, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply
No offense, but who is actually going to look this up and read your information about what a tropical cyclone is not. It was so hidden that WPTC members actually had no idea it existed in our project space until someone from outside the project notified us. So how would the "uneducated mind" ever find such an obscure page. Wikipedia is not your blog, if you wish to write on this topic bring it to a different site. - Marcusmax( speak) 13:38, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply
May I also point out that Wikipedia is not a "Personal essay", a "Personal web page", an "Instruction manuel" (you're saying what a tropical cyclone is not, that borders instructions), or an "Internet guide" (see previous). ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:25, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Tropical_cyclones/What_a_Tropical_Cyclone_Is_Not&oldid=1078602173"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs) per WP:CSD#G7 (author requested deletion). -- RL0919 ( talk) 22:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/What a Tropical Cyclone Is Not

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/What a Tropical Cyclone Is Not ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unnecessary joke page - seems like a clear case of WP:NOT. Part of a pattern of joke pages from this editor. MikeWazowski ( talk) 17:41, 25 July 2011 (UTC) reply

not a joke page. This is advice to TC page editors/creators.  --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Keeping the skies bright Chat Me Up 17:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Keep unless the project says that they don't want it. It doesn't look like the purpose of the page is entirely humourous and it is for the project to decide what pages they do and do not want. Hut 8.5 17:59, 25 July 2011 (UTC) change to Delete since the project evidently doesn't want it. Hut 8.5 10:42, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply
I don't think the project even knew it existed - I've now notified them of this discussion, tho. MikeWazowski ( talk) 18:33, 25 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - WPTC project member - Do we really need this? Some of the facts he has put down are wrong, eg: There will never be another TC named Katrina or Wilma after the Atlantic versions of 2005 as there was another Wilma earlier this year. There is a lot of stuff there that we do not need written down as it is common sense eg "A tropical cyclone is not a blizzard". Jason Rees ( talk) 19:51, 25 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Delete While boldness is good, there has to be a community benefit for pages to exist in the Wikipedia namespace (or in other namespaces, for that matter). We are here to build the encyclopedia, not to create unclear essays. Johnuniq ( talk) 00:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Of very, very limited use. I'm not one of the "guys" (apparently the hurricane folk are guys), mind you, but it seems they have spoken clearly. And there are dozens of redirects attached to this page. All this is taking up too much server space. Drmies ( talk) 00:56, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Just delete period - This is an eyesore. No one but the editor who made it has an interest in it. Plus it has absolutely no encyclopedic value. As for the user in question, accusing people of personal attacks with absolutely no evidence is rather incivil. Strange Passerby didn't accuse you of stupidity. You've implied it that way, but Strange Passerby did not outright call you stupid. Mitch32( Can someone turn on the damn air conditioning?) 18:22, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Objection to userfying - Why should this exist period, Wikipedia namespace or Userspace? This has no encyclopedic value and considering the editor in question here seems to be getting less civil, writing in disruptive text (which really should be removed by an uninvolved admin). This is a joke page. I am a fan of WP:BJAODN, but this should be somewhere like that, not in userspace. It has no value and why this is still open is beyond me.Mitch32( Can someone turn on the damn air conditioning?) 21:41, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply
    • If I'm serious, it's not a joke page I am serious, so it is not a joke page. It is a serious attempt at advice.  --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Keeping skies bright Chat Me Up 16:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC) reply
      • There is a very large dose of IDIDNTHEARTHAT here. Wikipedia is not a personal website where people store stuff that interests them. Everything (whether user space or not) is supposed to help the encyclopedia. Just consider all of the time from independent editors that is being wasted in this outbreak of nonsense—that alone should cause any collaborative editor to immediately desist and to ask for all their inappropriate pages to be removed. Johnuniq ( talk) 00:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Delete anyway. Moving it to userspace is just sweeping it under the rug and pretending it doesn't exist. If we don't want it, we don't want it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 00:12, 28 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Listen, guys, there are some important things here which are often misconceived. Not a Coastal Storm, Not a tornado, Not a tsunami, Not a Nor'Easter, Not Always Tropical, Not a Point, and Does Not Turn This, That, or the Other Way are all common myths and misconceptions which put people's lives in danger all the time. This is a guide to all of the misconceptions which are not true. It isn't a joke, It isn't nonsense, It isn't wrong, It isn't inappropriate, It is the difference between life and death. I am sorry if one or two users thought it was a joke, I am sorry if the tone mad too much light of the subject, but it is about discrediting misconceptions. You guys, having an interest in WPTC, can understand those issues, right? Everybody in the field has run into one of those internet idiots who thinks that landfall is required for damage; or that severe damage is limited to the coast; or that the storms all go this way or that and miss them; or that living in New York City somehow makes them safe. Those people have a dangerous misguided complacency which is as life threatening as the storm itself. A few of the other ones are just advice for article writers, but the list I have given here (also on the page in question) is life and death information. Saving the life of a well-informed person is easy. Saving the life of an ignorant one is not. If ignorant, TC-uneducated lives mean anything to this project, then this is not inappropriate. If those people mean anything to this project, then just leave it be in my userspace.  --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Keeping skies bright Chat Me Up 01:50, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply

I have never heard someone mistake a tropical cyclone for a tsunami or Nor'Easter. And I've never met someone who think they just reverse course in the opposite direction. Who exactly are you planning on saving? There's plenty of information on the page Hurricane as well as resources such as the National Hurricane Center that do this. No offense, but I doubt anybody is going to link to your "evacuated" page as a guide to understanding tropical systems. Inks.LWC ( talk) 06:21, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply
"Is Not a Tsunami" is about people who think that the storm surge is the only thing which can completely destroy a house, and is the opposite of "Is Not a Tornado". "Is Not a Nor'Easter" is about the difference between "landfall" and "direct hit" and even "indirect hit" and how any of the above can be very severe. "Does Not Turn This, That, or the Other Way" is about all of the people in places like Savannah, GA; Pensacola, FL; Washington, DC; and (formerly) New Orleans, LA who have had dangerous urban myths, logical fallacies, and complacency sown in by a few years without a TC strike. And, frankly, the I've had to rm that they form "almost exclusively in the tropical regions", which supports the idea that a TC is always tropical, to replace it with "often in the tropical regions". The TC article is very good, but it does not have what it needs for this, a misconceptions section and a full sweep for removing misconceptions. As for who's gonna see it, I don't know, but the same is true of any user-essay. The point is it is not inappropriate nor a joke. It is really about discrediting all of those misconceptions.  --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Keeping skies bright Chat Me Up 13:03, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply
No offense, but who is actually going to look this up and read your information about what a tropical cyclone is not. It was so hidden that WPTC members actually had no idea it existed in our project space until someone from outside the project notified us. So how would the "uneducated mind" ever find such an obscure page. Wikipedia is not your blog, if you wish to write on this topic bring it to a different site. - Marcusmax( speak) 13:38, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply
May I also point out that Wikipedia is not a "Personal essay", a "Personal web page", an "Instruction manuel" (you're saying what a tropical cyclone is not, that borders instructions), or an "Internet guide" (see previous). ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:25, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Tropical_cyclones/What_a_Tropical_Cyclone_Is_Not&oldid=1078602173"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE