- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. JohnCD ( talk) 22:01, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines/Drafts/Outline of fire safety
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines/Drafts/Outline of fire safety ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Old draft from 2007 that contains nothing in it. I'm not seeing what would be added here from Fire safety when Outline of firefighting already exists. Ricky81682 ( talk) 00:41, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - These are outlines created by an active editor who created them many years ago and edited them most recently last year. I'd encourage The Transhumanist to think about whether these are actually going to go anywhere, and to CSD if not, but I see no reason to delete a draft started by an active editor that isn't actively harmful. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – firefighting has to do with putting out fires. Fire safety is aimed at preventing them in the first place. They are related but different subjects. The draft is here because an outline is needed on the subject. I've never failed to make an outline more comprehensive than the root article -- there is almost always more coverage on Wikipedia for these subjects than what is in the root article. A quick glance at search results shows a number of articles on fire safety, and each of those articles leads to even more. These near-empty drafts are planning tools. So, it would be a good strategy to leave this skeleton as a place holder to remind me and others on what work needs to be done in the outline department. I hope to be back to daily editing in the next month or two. The Transhumanist 00:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. JohnCD ( talk) 22:01, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines/Drafts/Outline of fire safety
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines/Drafts/Outline of fire safety ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Old draft from 2007 that contains nothing in it. I'm not seeing what would be added here from Fire safety when Outline of firefighting already exists. Ricky81682 ( talk) 00:41, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - These are outlines created by an active editor who created them many years ago and edited them most recently last year. I'd encourage The Transhumanist to think about whether these are actually going to go anywhere, and to CSD if not, but I see no reason to delete a draft started by an active editor that isn't actively harmful. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – firefighting has to do with putting out fires. Fire safety is aimed at preventing them in the first place. They are related but different subjects. The draft is here because an outline is needed on the subject. I've never failed to make an outline more comprehensive than the root article -- there is almost always more coverage on Wikipedia for these subjects than what is in the root article. A quick glance at search results shows a number of articles on fire safety, and each of those articles leads to even more. These near-empty drafts are planning tools. So, it would be a good strategy to leave this skeleton as a place holder to remind me and others on what work needs to be done in the outline department. I hope to be back to daily editing in the next month or two. The Transhumanist 00:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.