- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Default keep. No consensus. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 16:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject IRC/Sandbox/Z-Net
This was userfied to rescue it from being deleted nine months ago. It hasn't been worked on despite the desperate cries that it could be fixed. This article is dead and still hanging around as a WP:FAKEARTICLE. Miami33139 ( talk) 04:11, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Violates spirit of WP:FAKEARTICLE (although that may refer to userspace while this is a subpage of a WikiProject). At any rate, it has been dormant for over 8 months, and does not show any promise of development. Johnuniq ( talk) 01:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep No deadline here, did you contact the wikiproject and ask about it? Also the conflict between the last editor of the article and the nom makes this look pretty pointy.
Hobit (
talk) 02:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- What is pointy is stashing this archived article in the sandbox of a Wikiproject and not touching it for a year. Judge this on the merits please: should a deleted article remain untouched in a sandbox?
Miami33139 (
talk) 04:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- It would seem you are wikistalking Tothwolf's contributions. Of the 30 or so things at MfD right now, at least 3 of them are you nominating things he's worked on. You were involved in an Arbcom case where you were accused of following that same user around and nominating their stuff for deletion. Given the massive size of Wikipedia, you'd think it would be trivial to avoid MfDing user/project space stuff of theirs--there is a lot more out there. Hobit ( talk) 10:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- What is pointy is stashing this archived article in the sandbox of a Wikiproject and not touching it for a year. Judge this on the merits please: should a deleted article remain untouched in a sandbox?
Miami33139 (
talk) 04:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep clearly has possibilities. Lots of articles get fixed after much longer than just a year & it isn't in mainspace, anyway. DGG ( talk) 04:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Default keep. No consensus. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 16:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject IRC/Sandbox/Z-Net
This was userfied to rescue it from being deleted nine months ago. It hasn't been worked on despite the desperate cries that it could be fixed. This article is dead and still hanging around as a WP:FAKEARTICLE. Miami33139 ( talk) 04:11, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Violates spirit of WP:FAKEARTICLE (although that may refer to userspace while this is a subpage of a WikiProject). At any rate, it has been dormant for over 8 months, and does not show any promise of development. Johnuniq ( talk) 01:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep No deadline here, did you contact the wikiproject and ask about it? Also the conflict between the last editor of the article and the nom makes this look pretty pointy.
Hobit (
talk) 02:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- What is pointy is stashing this archived article in the sandbox of a Wikiproject and not touching it for a year. Judge this on the merits please: should a deleted article remain untouched in a sandbox?
Miami33139 (
talk) 04:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- It would seem you are wikistalking Tothwolf's contributions. Of the 30 or so things at MfD right now, at least 3 of them are you nominating things he's worked on. You were involved in an Arbcom case where you were accused of following that same user around and nominating their stuff for deletion. Given the massive size of Wikipedia, you'd think it would be trivial to avoid MfDing user/project space stuff of theirs--there is a lot more out there. Hobit ( talk) 10:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- What is pointy is stashing this archived article in the sandbox of a Wikiproject and not touching it for a year. Judge this on the merits please: should a deleted article remain untouched in a sandbox?
Miami33139 (
talk) 04:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep clearly has possibilities. Lots of articles get fixed after much longer than just a year & it isn't in mainspace, anyway. DGG ( talk) 04:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.