- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Futurama/Peer review
Only one review. Nobody hasn't had a peer review in the Futurama WikiProject. JJ98 ( Talk) 04:25, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete only one very old review, nothing worth keeping. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 02:32, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- That's a non-trivial history of contribution there with no reason for deletion. Archive but don't delete. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 03:40, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete The sole peer review request there wasn't even answered. I agree with TenPoundHammer that there is nothing worth keeping, though I would not object to an archive per SmokeyJoe's request. Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Futurama/Peer review
Only one review. Nobody hasn't had a peer review in the Futurama WikiProject. JJ98 ( Talk) 04:25, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete only one very old review, nothing worth keeping. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 02:32, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- That's a non-trivial history of contribution there with no reason for deletion. Archive but don't delete. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 03:40, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete The sole peer review request there wasn't even answered. I agree with TenPoundHammer that there is nothing worth keeping, though I would not object to an archive per SmokeyJoe's request. Cunard ( talk) 09:42, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.