- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:51, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Project which has apparently only ever had one member (the creator). Dubious goals & the topic as a whole is probably better covered by a taskforce within WP:UKGEO, WP:England or WP:CITIES. No talk page activity. nancy 16:50, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete nothing worth saving, content is already covered by at least two wikiprojects. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 18:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom and Ten Pound Hammer. --
Kudpung (
talk)
12:03, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- But there are thousands of hamlets in a county. Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 15:51, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom and Kudpung. -- J3Mrs ( talk) 16:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete I never understood why this was set up. Many hamlets would not meet notability requirements on their own and are probably best dealt with in articles about the civil parish within which they fall. Those that are notable enough for an article are probably best dealt with by the relevant county projects rather than splitting the available effort.— Rod talk 16:56, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Most hamlets are not notable and are best included as part of their civil parish.-- Harkey ( talk) 20:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:51, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Project which has apparently only ever had one member (the creator). Dubious goals & the topic as a whole is probably better covered by a taskforce within WP:UKGEO, WP:England or WP:CITIES. No talk page activity. nancy 16:50, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete nothing worth saving, content is already covered by at least two wikiprojects. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 18:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom and Ten Pound Hammer. --
Kudpung (
talk)
12:03, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- But there are thousands of hamlets in a county. Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 15:51, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom and Kudpung. -- J3Mrs ( talk) 16:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete I never understood why this was set up. Many hamlets would not meet notability requirements on their own and are probably best dealt with in articles about the civil parish within which they fall. Those that are notable enough for an article are probably best dealt with by the relevant county projects rather than splitting the available effort.— Rod talk 16:56, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Most hamlets are not notable and are best included as part of their civil parish.-- Harkey ( talk) 20:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.