The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - This isn't what {{historical}} is for, that's for proposals that fail, procedures that are long since deprecated, or major projects that over time morphed into other things (like if WP:BIO were to be declared dead, we wouldn't want to delete it). This project is rightly tagged as inactive (notwithstanding the earlier MfD) because it is inactive; it is not historical because nobody cares nor ever will care what it has on it at this point. In this state its only value to the greater project is that it could eventually be re-organized. The topic has great potential for a WikiProject; however, it would most likely be something a group would want to start from scratch. --
Doug.(
talk •
contribs)20:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete. Tagging as historical might be a bit much, since there's really nothing there worth preserving in my opinion. Nightw05:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - This isn't what {{historical}} is for, that's for proposals that fail, procedures that are long since deprecated, or major projects that over time morphed into other things (like if WP:BIO were to be declared dead, we wouldn't want to delete it). This project is rightly tagged as inactive (notwithstanding the earlier MfD) because it is inactive; it is not historical because nobody cares nor ever will care what it has on it at this point. In this state its only value to the greater project is that it could eventually be re-organized. The topic has great potential for a WikiProject; however, it would most likely be something a group would want to start from scratch. --
Doug.(
talk •
contribs)20:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete. Tagging as historical might be a bit much, since there's really nothing there worth preserving in my opinion. Nightw05:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.