- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Now there's a surprise. -- kingboyk 13:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Project is both redundant, in that there are a number of other projects addressing both Islam and terrorism, and is also seemingly, intentionally, a POV fork. Wikipedia is not a place where someone can create what seems to be an inherently prejudiced group seeking to propogate a single viewpoint, as per Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Badbilltucker 23:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, and per WP:NPOV, of which this is a clear violation. M a rtinp23 23:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. "Education Taskforce"? -- Bookandcoffee 23:19, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. POV-pushing. -- Aguerriero ( talk) 00:51, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per WP:SNOWBALL. -- Ned Scott 01:00, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. BhaiSaab talk 03:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletions. -- BhaiSaab talk 03:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Obvious Delete, Wikipedia is not a battleground and this sort of "project" sets us up the bomb. A broader based/targetted Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering Propaganda would make sense though so long as the Wikiproject didn't solely target any one group spreading propaganda. ( → Netscott) 11:56, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Now there's a surprise. -- kingboyk 13:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Project is both redundant, in that there are a number of other projects addressing both Islam and terrorism, and is also seemingly, intentionally, a POV fork. Wikipedia is not a place where someone can create what seems to be an inherently prejudiced group seeking to propogate a single viewpoint, as per Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Badbilltucker 23:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, and per WP:NPOV, of which this is a clear violation. M a rtinp23 23:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. "Education Taskforce"? -- Bookandcoffee 23:19, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. POV-pushing. -- Aguerriero ( talk) 00:51, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per WP:SNOWBALL. -- Ned Scott 01:00, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. BhaiSaab talk 03:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletions. -- BhaiSaab talk 03:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Obvious Delete, Wikipedia is not a battleground and this sort of "project" sets us up the bomb. A broader based/targetted Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering Propaganda would make sense though so long as the Wikiproject didn't solely target any one group spreading propaganda. ( → Netscott) 11:56, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.