- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz ( talk) 01:52, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Two reasons: 1) The page consists only of one "encyclobox", which is simply a glorified userbox and 2) We don't need any more flavors of boxes. Sean William @ 00:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)\
- Delete useless having, could go into a missaclanious section. Esskater11 01:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete nonsense. – Pomte 04:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Possibly could add to one of the many other userbox pages on Wikipedia. Midorihana (talk) (contribs) 05:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but userfy as is User:Patricknoddy/Encycloboxes, which explains what the user is about. We are not clear what he really intends to do with this variety of userbox, but there is no need to cut him down now. -- Bduke ( talk) 07:27, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, this is nonsense. This exists in userspace already, so there's no point in userfying; a redirect to userspace would be deleted under R2. -- Core desat 21:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The userspace userbox itself is fine, but there's no need to create a separate directory for it. Also, it would be better to have a userbox that allows editors to specify the text they want displayed rather than to create a separate userboxes for every "encyclopedic fact". Black Falcon ( Talk) 23:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz ( talk) 01:52, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Two reasons: 1) The page consists only of one "encyclobox", which is simply a glorified userbox and 2) We don't need any more flavors of boxes. Sean William @ 00:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)\
- Delete useless having, could go into a missaclanious section. Esskater11 01:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete nonsense. – Pomte 04:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Possibly could add to one of the many other userbox pages on Wikipedia. Midorihana (talk) (contribs) 05:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but userfy as is User:Patricknoddy/Encycloboxes, which explains what the user is about. We are not clear what he really intends to do with this variety of userbox, but there is no need to cut him down now. -- Bduke ( talk) 07:27, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, this is nonsense. This exists in userspace already, so there's no point in userfying; a redirect to userspace would be deleted under R2. -- Core desat 21:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The userspace userbox itself is fine, but there's no need to create a separate directory for it. Also, it would be better to have a userbox that allows editors to specify the text they want displayed rather than to create a separate userboxes for every "encyclopedic fact". Black Falcon ( Talk) 23:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.