Wikipedia:Types of Vandalism
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Userfied to User:Flameviper12/Types of Vandalism per only contributor request. -- xaosflux Talk/ CVU 20:39, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Meandering essay that should perhaps redirect to
WP:-( or be userfied. —
BorgHunter
ubx (
talk) 03:27, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BEANS. It's not really useful, and an instance of categorization creep. -- cesarb 23:02, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Why is this as such?
I wrote this article and I was really, really wondering why it was tagged multiple times. I fixed Wikipedia:Vandalism to have a link for it under Types of Vandalism, but the link was removed and the types were reverted, although no content was taken out of the Wiki for the content move; it's all in the Types page. The types were hash-mash jumbled together in their present state; my article sorted them and provided a neat, nice categorization system for all vandalism. So why is it tagged? Alliterative in Alabama- This edit was actually made by anon
user:24.145.233.165
- No, I made this edit. I just wasn't logged in. Flameviper12 13:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- This edit was actually made by anon
user:24.145.233.165
- Move to User Space. The author is a former vandal who is now enthusiastic about helping the project, and he or she is obviously very proud of this essay. There is no need to delete the page, but it would probably be better in user space. Keep but userfy, per WP:BITE. -- Tantalum T e lluride 02:25, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Userify or delete (second choice). - seems like original research. ++ Lar: t/ c 02:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Very astute; I was a vandal before, now I wrote about vandalism. Hehehe. Bah, userfy it if need be. Oh well, at least it's well-written. That's all, folks. Flameviper12 13:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Wikipedia:Types of Vandalism
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Userfied to User:Flameviper12/Types of Vandalism per only contributor request. -- xaosflux Talk/ CVU 20:39, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Meandering essay that should perhaps redirect to
WP:-( or be userfied. —
BorgHunter
ubx (
talk) 03:27, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BEANS. It's not really useful, and an instance of categorization creep. -- cesarb 23:02, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Why is this as such?
I wrote this article and I was really, really wondering why it was tagged multiple times. I fixed Wikipedia:Vandalism to have a link for it under Types of Vandalism, but the link was removed and the types were reverted, although no content was taken out of the Wiki for the content move; it's all in the Types page. The types were hash-mash jumbled together in their present state; my article sorted them and provided a neat, nice categorization system for all vandalism. So why is it tagged? Alliterative in Alabama- This edit was actually made by anon
user:24.145.233.165
- No, I made this edit. I just wasn't logged in. Flameviper12 13:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- This edit was actually made by anon
user:24.145.233.165
- Move to User Space. The author is a former vandal who is now enthusiastic about helping the project, and he or she is obviously very proud of this essay. There is no need to delete the page, but it would probably be better in user space. Keep but userfy, per WP:BITE. -- Tantalum T e lluride 02:25, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Userify or delete (second choice). - seems like original research. ++ Lar: t/ c 02:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Very astute; I was a vandal before, now I wrote about vandalism. Hehehe. Bah, userfy it if need be. Oh well, at least it's well-written. That's all, folks. Flameviper12 13:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.