- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was keep. — Aitias // discussion 21:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
This page seems have been lacking real updates the last two years, and so, it is outdated, and might give wrong advice to people. → Aza Toth 16:24, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Have dates or the periodic table changed in the last couple of years? That may seem like a flippant question, but I'm serious: is there some specific way in which each of these templates or associated verbiage is so out of date that it creates harm (which can include pointless churn) to the encyclopedia? Jclemens ( talk) 17:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep If it is a bit outdated, wouldn't the thing to do be to update it? It seems like just deleting it wouldn't really help anything. Hi878 ( talk) 21:41, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep as being mainly utile. Collect ( talk) 22:35, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Tag as historical if it's outdated. The info seems useful at least. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 19:03, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep we don't remove documentation because it has dated, instead it should be updated with the latest information. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 11:49, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Tag as historical or warn that information might be outdated. Or fix it. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 09:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep As historical. MBisanz talk 13:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was keep. — Aitias // discussion 21:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
This page seems have been lacking real updates the last two years, and so, it is outdated, and might give wrong advice to people. → Aza Toth 16:24, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Have dates or the periodic table changed in the last couple of years? That may seem like a flippant question, but I'm serious: is there some specific way in which each of these templates or associated verbiage is so out of date that it creates harm (which can include pointless churn) to the encyclopedia? Jclemens ( talk) 17:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep If it is a bit outdated, wouldn't the thing to do be to update it? It seems like just deleting it wouldn't really help anything. Hi878 ( talk) 21:41, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep as being mainly utile. Collect ( talk) 22:35, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Tag as historical if it's outdated. The info seems useful at least. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 19:03, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep we don't remove documentation because it has dated, instead it should be updated with the latest information. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 11:49, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Tag as historical or warn that information might be outdated. Or fix it. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 09:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep As historical. MBisanz talk 13:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.