From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was "mark historical"Bencherlite Talk 22:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:Requests for watching

Wikipedia:Requests for watching ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

No longer used and there are formal and informal means of doing what this page does. It was mainly used by one editor. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 08:27, 3 October 2012 (UTC) reply

  • Tag as {{ historical}}. A proposal for a process created in 2006 that never really caught on.-- SGCM (talk) 17:55, 3 October 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Tag as historical per SGCM. Graham 87 07:27, 5 October 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Dates back to 2007 and never developed. I don't see any reason for tagging this and leaving it around. -- Klein zach 05:34, 9 October 2012 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was "mark historical"Bencherlite Talk 22:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:Requests for watching

Wikipedia:Requests for watching ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

No longer used and there are formal and informal means of doing what this page does. It was mainly used by one editor. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 08:27, 3 October 2012 (UTC) reply

  • Tag as {{ historical}}. A proposal for a process created in 2006 that never really caught on.-- SGCM (talk) 17:55, 3 October 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Tag as historical per SGCM. Graham 87 07:27, 5 October 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Dates back to 2007 and never developed. I don't see any reason for tagging this and leaving it around. -- Klein zach 05:34, 9 October 2012 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook