The result of the debate was Keep per policy and clear precedent. Xoloz 17:46, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
This nomination was initially formatted incorrectly, real nomination appears immediately below. stillnotelf is invisible 03:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Everyone associated with this RFC was banned by the sysops acting in bad faith. It's no longer a relevant RFC, even though the article was deleted in bad faith, it met the requirements for a bio by several standards, and those acting to delete were simply people who disagreed with his political views. The point remains, the sysops violated additional policies and ran anyone who supported this article out of wikipedia and therefore the RFC is moot.
The result of the debate was Keep per policy and clear precedent. Xoloz 17:46, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
This nomination was initially formatted incorrectly, real nomination appears immediately below. stillnotelf is invisible 03:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Everyone associated with this RFC was banned by the sysops acting in bad faith. It's no longer a relevant RFC, even though the article was deleted in bad faith, it met the requirements for a bio by several standards, and those acting to delete were simply people who disagreed with his political views. The point remains, the sysops violated additional policies and ran anyone who supported this article out of wikipedia and therefore the RFC is moot.