- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy Close in favor of clarifiation from the Arbitration Committee, who may take action with regard to this case and its associated subpages at their discretion. An MFD on this matter is both premature and beyond the purview of MFD. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 01:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Orangemarlin
This "case" does not reflect an enforceable decision by the Arbitration Committee, as only one arbitrator, FT2, has publicly endorsed the outcome, while another Arbitrator, Kirill Lokshin, asserts that the decision in this "case" has no force or effect:This issue has been the subject of further discussion on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Orangemarlin and other matters. It appears that this "case" is a nullity, and should be deleted. John254 01:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)The announcements made today by FT2 (including both the Orangemarlin issue and the various other matters) were posted without the approval or prior knowledge of the Committee as a whole. Further, no formal proceeding, secret or otherwise, has taken place regarding Orangemarlin or any other editor named in that particular statement. As far as I'm concerned, these announcements have no authority or binding weight whatsoever. [1]
- Stop causing Drama John - this isn't resolved yet and we don't know anything. Leave it until we actualy have some firm comments from the arbs. Ryan Postlethwaite 01:26, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Request early closure; premature deletion request. Let's hear from the other Committee members. Durova Charge! 01:28, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Userfy to FT2's space. This cannot remain in the ArbCom's space as this is not the case but a joke. --
Irpen
01:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy close, we don't know the facts yet. There's obviously more to this. Stop the drama John. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy Close in favor of clarifiation from the Arbitration Committee, who may take action with regard to this case and its associated subpages at their discretion. An MFD on this matter is both premature and beyond the purview of MFD. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 01:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Orangemarlin
This "case" does not reflect an enforceable decision by the Arbitration Committee, as only one arbitrator, FT2, has publicly endorsed the outcome, while another Arbitrator, Kirill Lokshin, asserts that the decision in this "case" has no force or effect:This issue has been the subject of further discussion on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Orangemarlin and other matters. It appears that this "case" is a nullity, and should be deleted. John254 01:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)The announcements made today by FT2 (including both the Orangemarlin issue and the various other matters) were posted without the approval or prior knowledge of the Committee as a whole. Further, no formal proceeding, secret or otherwise, has taken place regarding Orangemarlin or any other editor named in that particular statement. As far as I'm concerned, these announcements have no authority or binding weight whatsoever. [1]
- Stop causing Drama John - this isn't resolved yet and we don't know anything. Leave it until we actualy have some firm comments from the arbs. Ryan Postlethwaite 01:26, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Request early closure; premature deletion request. Let's hear from the other Committee members. Durova Charge! 01:28, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Userfy to FT2's space. This cannot remain in the ArbCom's space as this is not the case but a joke. --
Irpen
01:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy close, we don't know the facts yet. There's obviously more to this. Stop the drama John. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.