The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep, as archived and protected, as it was. This was the method for protecting mainspace paged from vandalism, and history should not be thoughtlessly deleted. It is not junk, it is Wikipedia history, and it is not causing any problem. —
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
00:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep per my last !vote – also nothing has changed since the last nomination and renominating it just brings more attention to the page, which goes against the reason for blanking it in the first place.
Graham87 (
talk)
03:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. 99% of vandals aren't going to check the history logs for an obscure fully protected page, so it's no longer really a concern in that way. It's interesting history without much harm in the current state it's in and should be kept.
PARAKANYAA (
talk)
11:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep, as archived and protected, as it was. This was the method for protecting mainspace paged from vandalism, and history should not be thoughtlessly deleted. It is not junk, it is Wikipedia history, and it is not causing any problem. —
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
00:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep per my last !vote – also nothing has changed since the last nomination and renominating it just brings more attention to the page, which goes against the reason for blanking it in the first place.
Graham87 (
talk)
03:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. 99% of vandals aren't going to check the history logs for an obscure fully protected page, so it's no longer really a concern in that way. It's interesting history without much harm in the current state it's in and should be kept.
PARAKANYAA (
talk)
11:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.