The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Also tagging for {{essay}}; further discussion can occur on the talk page.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 09:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep. I don't see it as harmful, and it might become something very useful later. I'd just tag it like {{Essay}} or something imo rather than delete. –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 17:06, 26 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep. This page has its uses. Whether or not it should be tagged as some kind of essay, I'll leave for others to decide.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk) 23:24, 26 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep not particularly helpful in
this form, and the language is problematic (e.g. "profoundly disturbing wickedness"), but nothing that can't be improved/fixed. Headbomb {
t ·
c ·
p ·
b} 23:26, 26 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep. No valid reason for deletion. There was some mis-taggery, easily fixed. It is some form of {{essay}}. —
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 01:15, 27 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose current name, neutral on deletion: Nothing on this page describes Wikipedia misconduct. Everything is about misconduct on Wikipedia. --
Guy Macon (
talk) 09:10, 28 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Also tagging for {{essay}}; further discussion can occur on the talk page.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 09:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep. I don't see it as harmful, and it might become something very useful later. I'd just tag it like {{Essay}} or something imo rather than delete. –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 17:06, 26 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep. This page has its uses. Whether or not it should be tagged as some kind of essay, I'll leave for others to decide.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk) 23:24, 26 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep not particularly helpful in
this form, and the language is problematic (e.g. "profoundly disturbing wickedness"), but nothing that can't be improved/fixed. Headbomb {
t ·
c ·
p ·
b} 23:26, 26 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep. No valid reason for deletion. There was some mis-taggery, easily fixed. It is some form of {{essay}}. —
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 01:15, 27 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose current name, neutral on deletion: Nothing on this page describes Wikipedia misconduct. Everything is about misconduct on Wikipedia. --
Guy Macon (
talk) 09:10, 28 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.