The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Joke's over ( non-admin closure) * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 11:54, 2 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Xaosflux/Requests for adminship/Wikipe-tan

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Xaosflux/Requests for adminship/Wikipe-tan ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​

Some men don't nominate pages for deletion based on anything logical, like policies and guidelines... they can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn. jp× g 04:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC) reply

• Restore. I already did this joke. – MJL  ‐Talk‐ ^☖ 15:49, 1 April 2021 (UTC) reply
• Double comment. Per results of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/User:Xaosflux/Requests for adminship/Wikipe-tan. I am the greatest at this game. – MJL  ‐Talk‐ ^☖ 15:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC) reply
• Keep per ........
• One day I'll nominate Wikipe-tan again... — xaosflux ^Talk 18:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC) reply

  I approve, she would make an excellent admin. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 19:06, 1 April 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.