The result of the discussion was: delete. No prejudice against creating a redirect to the category, if desired. —ScottyWong— 15:05, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
All prior XfDs for this page: |
This is a completely unnecessary page and an even worse precedent. Any templates related to this are found in Category:MTR templates. There is really no reason to create project pages for this, especially when it has 4 entries (and is obviously out of sync with the category). Gonnym ( talk) 11:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
to give context to historical discussions and to inform future discussions on similar topics. For what possible reason would keeping this as a historical page be of benefit? It hasn't ever been discussed anywhere, there are no incoming links worth worrying about, it's not an old policy that people might need to refer to and there are no useful discussions on it's talk page that might need referencing to. The process of marking stuff as historical is intended to keep stuff around when there's a need to continue accessing it e.g. keeping a record of discussions about problems that may be relevant in the future or to keep a copy of old policies that were cited in discussions, it's not supposed to be a way of hoarding rubbish in project space just because it's old. 192.76.8.70 ( talk) 18:03, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. No prejudice against creating a redirect to the category, if desired. —ScottyWong— 15:05, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
All prior XfDs for this page: |
This is a completely unnecessary page and an even worse precedent. Any templates related to this are found in Category:MTR templates. There is really no reason to create project pages for this, especially when it has 4 entries (and is obviously out of sync with the category). Gonnym ( talk) 11:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
to give context to historical discussions and to inform future discussions on similar topics. For what possible reason would keeping this as a historical page be of benefit? It hasn't ever been discussed anywhere, there are no incoming links worth worrying about, it's not an old policy that people might need to refer to and there are no useful discussions on it's talk page that might need referencing to. The process of marking stuff as historical is intended to keep stuff around when there's a need to continue accessing it e.g. keeping a record of discussions about problems that may be relevant in the future or to keep a copy of old policies that were cited in discussions, it's not supposed to be a way of hoarding rubbish in project space just because it's old. 192.76.8.70 ( talk) 18:03, 12 March 2022 (UTC)