The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Does not follow the LTA guidelines. Reads more like an
WP:ANI report. Filer has had, at that time, a tendency to misidentify edits as vandalism sometimes. This fails all the LTA criteria because:
Handpolk has not disrupted Wikipedia over a long period of time. In fact Handpolk is was a legitimate editor.
Handpolk did not have any socks nor was their account indeffed.
DeleteWP:LTA is sufficiently long and minor cases of bad behavior should not be listed. The best procedure is
WP:DENY and LTA is kept for its functional value, not as a shrine to record every disruptive editor. I don't see why it should be userfied because it would then fail
WP:POLEMIC which applies even for indeffed/banned users—if there were a reason to record anything it should be at LTA.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:25, 3 August 2015 (UTC)reply
comment I don't mind this report being deleted. Handpolk was reported and subsquently blocked for his actions. As for "Filer has a tendency to misidentify edits as vandalism sometimes.", it should be changed/corrected to – Filer hasHAD a tendency to misidentify edits as vandalism sometimes. You can look at all my recent edits and I rarely put vandalism as the reason. So all in all, go ahead and delete this not needed (anymore) report. Take care. –
Sabbatino (
talk)
14:36, 3 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Does not follow the LTA guidelines. Reads more like an
WP:ANI report. Filer has had, at that time, a tendency to misidentify edits as vandalism sometimes. This fails all the LTA criteria because:
Handpolk has not disrupted Wikipedia over a long period of time. In fact Handpolk is was a legitimate editor.
Handpolk did not have any socks nor was their account indeffed.
DeleteWP:LTA is sufficiently long and minor cases of bad behavior should not be listed. The best procedure is
WP:DENY and LTA is kept for its functional value, not as a shrine to record every disruptive editor. I don't see why it should be userfied because it would then fail
WP:POLEMIC which applies even for indeffed/banned users—if there were a reason to record anything it should be at LTA.
Johnuniq (
talk)
02:25, 3 August 2015 (UTC)reply
comment I don't mind this report being deleted. Handpolk was reported and subsquently blocked for his actions. As for "Filer has a tendency to misidentify edits as vandalism sometimes.", it should be changed/corrected to – Filer hasHAD a tendency to misidentify edits as vandalism sometimes. You can look at all my recent edits and I rarely put vandalism as the reason. So all in all, go ahead and delete this not needed (anymore) report. Take care. –
Sabbatino (
talk)
14:36, 3 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.