The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep (as the creator). It is a research tool for editors and the list is not in the mainspace. Now with free access to Newspapers.com via Wikipedia (which does not give access to the premium tier of service) I am less reliant on individual archives. I use online newspaper archives on a daily basis to find obituaries of the more obscure notable people. --
Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (
talk)
18:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep – A valuable research tool for Wikipedia's editors to help improve and expand the encyclopedia. This is evidenced in part by the
20,951 page views the page has received in the last thirty days as of this post. This averages out to almost 700 page views per day. North America100004:01, 28 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - A resource page in Wikipedia space providing a list of resources to aid referencing is useful and aligned with the goals of building a free encyclopedia that anybody can edit. --
Whpq (
talk)
21:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep, I've used this page over a hundred times, easy, and working in a municipal archives, I've recommended this page to the public. Also, +1 to User:Northamerica1000's comment about its frequent use. --
Zanimum (
talk)
21:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - I, and many of my acquaintances, consult this particular Wikipedia page weekly.
Rather, I would like Wikipedia to more closely monitor those whose main purpose on the site seems to be deleting- rather than "fixing"- images. texts, and entries.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep (as the creator). It is a research tool for editors and the list is not in the mainspace. Now with free access to Newspapers.com via Wikipedia (which does not give access to the premium tier of service) I am less reliant on individual archives. I use online newspaper archives on a daily basis to find obituaries of the more obscure notable people. --
Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (
talk)
18:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep – A valuable research tool for Wikipedia's editors to help improve and expand the encyclopedia. This is evidenced in part by the
20,951 page views the page has received in the last thirty days as of this post. This averages out to almost 700 page views per day. North America100004:01, 28 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - A resource page in Wikipedia space providing a list of resources to aid referencing is useful and aligned with the goals of building a free encyclopedia that anybody can edit. --
Whpq (
talk)
21:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep, I've used this page over a hundred times, easy, and working in a municipal archives, I've recommended this page to the public. Also, +1 to User:Northamerica1000's comment about its frequent use. --
Zanimum (
talk)
21:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - I, and many of my acquaintances, consult this particular Wikipedia page weekly.
Rather, I would like Wikipedia to more closely monitor those whose main purpose on the site seems to be deleting- rather than "fixing"- images. texts, and entries.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.