- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:15, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Blocks
Seems this page hasn't had a clear or utilized purpose from even when it was created in 2009. Steel1943 ( talk) 02:00, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Appears to be something of a nothing. Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:45, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, archive only. Once was used and useful, before being deprecated due to other changes. --
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 01:57, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- ...
Really?? I think when you say "once was used", I think you meant "was used once".
Steel1943 (
talk) 21:43, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- That’s more than enough. Is it your intention to bring everything unused through MfD? —
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 22:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- Nah, just the stuff that seemed to never have any value to the project at any given point. Thus, I see no purpose for this page to remain, even as an archive. Even with the one use, it doesn't seem that the inquiry got the attention that was intended by the purpose of the page. (I was originally considering just redirecting this page elsewhere, but due to its lack of use, I didn't see that helpful or to have any utility as a search term.) Steel1943 ( talk) 03:54, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
- That’s more than enough. Is it your intention to bring everything unused through MfD? —
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 22:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- ...
Really?? I think when you say "once was used", I think you meant "was used once".
Steel1943 (
talk) 21:43, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- Weak delete. Confusing and pointless. I've been waiting for someone to explain how deleting this would break something, somewhere. But they've had their chance. The edit filter has never blocked or degrouped anyone in the history of enwiki. The only people ever reporting anything at this page have either been blocked on another wiki, merely had their edits disallowed (for which we have WP:EF/FP/R of course), or have just been randomly clicking at buttons. Granted, it's not an urgent matter that we get rid of this, but here we are, so let's be done with it. Suffusion of Yellow ( talk) 04:15, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:15, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Blocks
Seems this page hasn't had a clear or utilized purpose from even when it was created in 2009. Steel1943 ( talk) 02:00, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Appears to be something of a nothing. Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:45, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, archive only. Once was used and useful, before being deprecated due to other changes. --
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 01:57, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- ...
Really?? I think when you say "once was used", I think you meant "was used once".
Steel1943 (
talk) 21:43, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- That’s more than enough. Is it your intention to bring everything unused through MfD? —
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 22:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- Nah, just the stuff that seemed to never have any value to the project at any given point. Thus, I see no purpose for this page to remain, even as an archive. Even with the one use, it doesn't seem that the inquiry got the attention that was intended by the purpose of the page. (I was originally considering just redirecting this page elsewhere, but due to its lack of use, I didn't see that helpful or to have any utility as a search term.) Steel1943 ( talk) 03:54, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
- That’s more than enough. Is it your intention to bring everything unused through MfD? —
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 22:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- ...
Really?? I think when you say "once was used", I think you meant "was used once".
Steel1943 (
talk) 21:43, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- Weak delete. Confusing and pointless. I've been waiting for someone to explain how deleting this would break something, somewhere. But they've had their chance. The edit filter has never blocked or degrouped anyone in the history of enwiki. The only people ever reporting anything at this page have either been blocked on another wiki, merely had their edits disallowed (for which we have WP:EF/FP/R of course), or have just been randomly clicking at buttons. Granted, it's not an urgent matter that we get rid of this, but here we are, so let's be done with it. Suffusion of Yellow ( talk) 04:15, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.