- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. The bot that originally updated the page may be out of commission, but the bot coder has indicated that he intends to repair it; also, no one has indicated a desire for the page's deletion but the nominator. If the page is not updated within a reasonable time, sure, feel free to renominate, but try to fix it first. Titoxd( ?!? - cool stuff) 03:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Community Portal/Opentask
Has not been updated in a long time, perlre who is said to update the page isn't updating it, berland seems to have done some manual updated is the past, but stopped two months ago. I say it's time to scrap this page. → Aza Toth 14:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Not a fan of removing anything due to inactivity. As this open tasks list is quite open to the public, it's very likely that a bold editor might come along and update it anytime. For instance, see the changes done this month. Michaelas10 Respect my authoritah 15:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep for Now Lets give this portal a few months before we delete it to see if it will become active. -- James, La gloria è a dio 18:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Question Would it be possible to get a replacement for Pearle? -- KFP ( talk | contribs) 18:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I don't think we should delete it just because Pearle isn't updating the page. Couldn't we do, as KFP suggested, and get a replacement?-- theblueflamingo Squawk 19:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I really do not see why not. Peace:) -- James, La gloria è a dio 19:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment The usefulness of this page is completely dependent on it being up to date. If we can't keep it updated, it is not useful. -- KFP ( talk | contribs) 19:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with you. If we have no one who will update it regularly then we really do not have a need for it. I think we should give this some time before we delete it though. If we can not find anyone to update it then we can delete it. Thanks. -- James, La gloria è a dio 23:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, please try to fix before deleting (apologies if you have already tried). A request for assistance at Wikipedia:Bot requests would seem the first step? If deleted, we'd also need to first find a replacement for the large hole it would leave at Wikipedia:Community Portal. -- Quiddity 04:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - Pearle has been broken for the past few months, but I can try to fix her in the next two weeks. Sorry for the neglect, the real world has been keeping me busy lately. -- Beland 20:29, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. The bot that originally updated the page may be out of commission, but the bot coder has indicated that he intends to repair it; also, no one has indicated a desire for the page's deletion but the nominator. If the page is not updated within a reasonable time, sure, feel free to renominate, but try to fix it first. Titoxd( ?!? - cool stuff) 03:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Community Portal/Opentask
Has not been updated in a long time, perlre who is said to update the page isn't updating it, berland seems to have done some manual updated is the past, but stopped two months ago. I say it's time to scrap this page. → Aza Toth 14:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Not a fan of removing anything due to inactivity. As this open tasks list is quite open to the public, it's very likely that a bold editor might come along and update it anytime. For instance, see the changes done this month. Michaelas10 Respect my authoritah 15:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep for Now Lets give this portal a few months before we delete it to see if it will become active. -- James, La gloria è a dio 18:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Question Would it be possible to get a replacement for Pearle? -- KFP ( talk | contribs) 18:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I don't think we should delete it just because Pearle isn't updating the page. Couldn't we do, as KFP suggested, and get a replacement?-- theblueflamingo Squawk 19:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I really do not see why not. Peace:) -- James, La gloria è a dio 19:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment The usefulness of this page is completely dependent on it being up to date. If we can't keep it updated, it is not useful. -- KFP ( talk | contribs) 19:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with you. If we have no one who will update it regularly then we really do not have a need for it. I think we should give this some time before we delete it though. If we can not find anyone to update it then we can delete it. Thanks. -- James, La gloria è a dio 23:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, please try to fix before deleting (apologies if you have already tried). A request for assistance at Wikipedia:Bot requests would seem the first step? If deleted, we'd also need to first find a replacement for the large hole it would leave at Wikipedia:Community Portal. -- Quiddity 04:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - Pearle has been broken for the past few months, but I can try to fix her in the next two weeks. Sorry for the neglect, the real world has been keeping me busy lately. -- Beland 20:29, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.