From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep . and mark as {{humor}}. ♠ PMC(talk) 23:32, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:Committee for getting things done

Wikipedia:Committee for getting things done ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stillborn wikiproject with overly vague focus. Only ever had six members, none of whom seem to have ever done anything. Talk page untouched since 2010. Project is not linked from anywhere except user's talk pages. Ten Pound Hammer( What did I screw up now?) 16:08, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply

none of whom seem to have ever done anything - I think you missed the point... All the best: Rich  Farmbrough, 16:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC). reply
Why delete this? At the most, userfy it. ― Justin (koavf)TCM 16:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete its more of a joke which was funny but now old. Legacypac ( talk) 16:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: (not a !vote.) Should this be userfied? -- Guy Macon ( talk) 18:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Archive. No apparent redirect target. Keep as satire. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 00:37, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Per nom. Ancient, throwaway joke that serves no current purpose. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 03:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
    • Old jokes are part of our history. The worst jokes are worst for touching too closely. Satire that tends pathos. History burning is rarely a good thing. It serves a purpose. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 03:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Preserve (in other words oppose deletion) in some form (whether it be a keep, userfication, redirection, etc.). No opposition to marking it as {{ humor}}. —  Godsy ( TALK CONT) 19:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep . and mark as {{humor}}. ♠ PMC(talk) 23:32, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:Committee for getting things done

Wikipedia:Committee for getting things done ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stillborn wikiproject with overly vague focus. Only ever had six members, none of whom seem to have ever done anything. Talk page untouched since 2010. Project is not linked from anywhere except user's talk pages. Ten Pound Hammer( What did I screw up now?) 16:08, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply

none of whom seem to have ever done anything - I think you missed the point... All the best: Rich  Farmbrough, 16:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC). reply
Why delete this? At the most, userfy it. ― Justin (koavf)TCM 16:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete its more of a joke which was funny but now old. Legacypac ( talk) 16:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: (not a !vote.) Should this be userfied? -- Guy Macon ( talk) 18:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Archive. No apparent redirect target. Keep as satire. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 00:37, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Per nom. Ancient, throwaway joke that serves no current purpose. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 03:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
    • Old jokes are part of our history. The worst jokes are worst for touching too closely. Satire that tends pathos. History burning is rarely a good thing. It serves a purpose. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 03:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Preserve (in other words oppose deletion) in some form (whether it be a keep, userfication, redirection, etc.). No opposition to marking it as {{ humor}}. —  Godsy ( TALK CONT) 19:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook