- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Left a {{ for}} link on WP:PIE. — xaosflux Talk 11:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
WM:PIE
Wikipedia doesn't use the WM: namespace, and this soft redirects to meta:Polling is evil The Helpful One Review 22:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: History shows created by User:RenamedUser2, see block log, WilyD. The Helpful One Review 22:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete The proper link is m:Page; I don't think there is a wm: link. Cross-wiki redirect which serves little purpose. PeterSymonds ( talk) 22:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- weak Delete. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 03:25, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it was viewed 44 times in September, so it's not a useless redirect. Personally, it's not something any regular reader is going to stumble upon, so there's no problems from that end. It's not unreasonable to imagine an editor using a WM: prefix, since en.wp uses a WP: and meta uses the WM: prefix. It's a useful redirect, and doesn't seem to be a problem. So no need to delete. seresin ( ¡? ) 03:38, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Improper interwiki-redirect. MBisanz talk 13:43, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Honestly I don't support using home-wiki links to interwiki. Although in this case I see why we might want to keep it, I'm not sure it's really practical. — Ceranthor ( Sing) 11:53, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Left a {{ for}} link on WP:PIE. — xaosflux Talk 11:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
WM:PIE
Wikipedia doesn't use the WM: namespace, and this soft redirects to meta:Polling is evil The Helpful One Review 22:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: History shows created by User:RenamedUser2, see block log, WilyD. The Helpful One Review 22:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete The proper link is m:Page; I don't think there is a wm: link. Cross-wiki redirect which serves little purpose. PeterSymonds ( talk) 22:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- weak Delete. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 03:25, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it was viewed 44 times in September, so it's not a useless redirect. Personally, it's not something any regular reader is going to stumble upon, so there's no problems from that end. It's not unreasonable to imagine an editor using a WM: prefix, since en.wp uses a WP: and meta uses the WM: prefix. It's a useful redirect, and doesn't seem to be a problem. So no need to delete. seresin ( ¡? ) 03:38, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Improper interwiki-redirect. MBisanz talk 13:43, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Honestly I don't support using home-wiki links to interwiki. Although in this case I see why we might want to keep it, I'm not sure it's really practical. — Ceranthor ( Sing) 11:53, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.