- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per CSD U1 by RHaworth. ( non-admin closure) Cloudyjbg27512 ( talk) 14:31, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
User:Yvh11a/BillyMaysOneForTheAngels
Stale draft of One for the Angels with misinformation, swapping out other names for that of Billy Mays. Not needed, could misinform. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 09:13, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Content fork and misleading. The first edit summary "created article" is offensive to required attribution, and the second "humor" indicates non-serious intentions. I see no project-related humor here. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 09:48, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This could be speedy deleted as a hoax. — Anne Delong ( talk) 19:32, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I thought this was funny when I created it; it's not. Burninate it. Yvh11a ( Talk • Contribs) 17:25, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per CSD U1 by RHaworth. ( non-admin closure) Cloudyjbg27512 ( talk) 14:31, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
User:Yvh11a/BillyMaysOneForTheAngels
Stale draft of One for the Angels with misinformation, swapping out other names for that of Billy Mays. Not needed, could misinform. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 09:13, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Content fork and misleading. The first edit summary "created article" is offensive to required attribution, and the second "humor" indicates non-serious intentions. I see no project-related humor here. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 09:48, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This could be speedy deleted as a hoax. — Anne Delong ( talk) 19:32, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I thought this was funny when I created it; it's not. Burninate it. Yvh11a ( Talk • Contribs) 17:25, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.