The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Keep This editor has recently returned to the project,
WP:AGF goes a long way towards established editors, all sandboxes are being reset to {{user sandbox}} where they can be reused in the future as needed. —
xaosfluxTalk 15:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC) —
xaosfluxTalk15:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep I don't think any of Davey's claims can be taken as read here given he's been trying to delete of a lot of bus company and bus route related articles from Wikipedia recently, and these pages seem to me to be drafts of bus related articles. For example, I looked at
User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox4, and what's in there doesn't remotely seem to be already in Wikipedia. I found precisely two lines about park and ride bus services in the
Bus transport in Cardiff article. If the author is indeed now absent, I suspect Davey is not so much concerned about the fact there's no point in keeping them now, rather than the fact someone else might find them and put them into Wikipedia themselves.
Notforlackofeffort (
talk)
16:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment These need to be broken out more. If the content has been used in articles, there needs to be a history merge and/or redirect, not deletion. Sandbox5 with
this giant dump is probably just a bad copy-and-paste that can be deleted (I'm not sure from where), Capital City Red is
this version which can be deleted. Sandbox6 is blank so I don't see why it should be deleted. Haven't looked at the rest at the moment. --
Ricky81682 (
talk)
08:25, 28 January 2015 (UTC)reply
There's nothing to be merged unfortunately but anyway I've broke everything down
Sandbox5 was copied entirely from a french wikipedia (If he's used the Google Translator than there's no hope for this at all!)
Sandbox8 is basically some of the
Cardiff article (Most of whats here is in the Cardiff article already
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Keep This editor has recently returned to the project,
WP:AGF goes a long way towards established editors, all sandboxes are being reset to {{user sandbox}} where they can be reused in the future as needed. —
xaosfluxTalk 15:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC) —
xaosfluxTalk15:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep I don't think any of Davey's claims can be taken as read here given he's been trying to delete of a lot of bus company and bus route related articles from Wikipedia recently, and these pages seem to me to be drafts of bus related articles. For example, I looked at
User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox4, and what's in there doesn't remotely seem to be already in Wikipedia. I found precisely two lines about park and ride bus services in the
Bus transport in Cardiff article. If the author is indeed now absent, I suspect Davey is not so much concerned about the fact there's no point in keeping them now, rather than the fact someone else might find them and put them into Wikipedia themselves.
Notforlackofeffort (
talk)
16:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment These need to be broken out more. If the content has been used in articles, there needs to be a history merge and/or redirect, not deletion. Sandbox5 with
this giant dump is probably just a bad copy-and-paste that can be deleted (I'm not sure from where), Capital City Red is
this version which can be deleted. Sandbox6 is blank so I don't see why it should be deleted. Haven't looked at the rest at the moment. --
Ricky81682 (
talk)
08:25, 28 January 2015 (UTC)reply
There's nothing to be merged unfortunately but anyway I've broke everything down
Sandbox5 was copied entirely from a french wikipedia (If he's used the Google Translator than there's no hope for this at all!)
Sandbox8 is basically some of the
Cardiff article (Most of whats here is in the Cardiff article already
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.