- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Redirect to the article that now contains the content formerly found on this page. -- RL0919 ( talk) 02:31, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
User:Vecrumba/SovietJewishLatvia
Personal archived version of content such might be found in Jews in Latvia - Soviet occupation, 1940–1941 is disfavored per WP:STALEDRAFT. -- Uzma Gamal ( talk) 23:59, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete You've found quite a few of these today. :) ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 00:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment It's "stale" because I'm currently topic banned in the area encompassing the article. Please un-nominate.
PЄTЄRS
JVЄСRUМВА ► TALK 02:59, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Since there has been discussion on the page after the MfD nomination, the nomination can't be withdrawn. The last edit on the page was 19 May 2007. --
Uzma Gamal (
talk) 13:29, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- The "discussion" has nothing to do with the article (or my saving Latvian language content) for future use. If/once deleted, I will then be forced to request it be recreated in my user space where it is now citing my inactivity for reasons explained. I would suggest you upgrade your bot (or procedure) to do courtesy notices with some "if not responded by, article will be nominated for deletion per XYZ" to avoid causing editors to expend effort as here. I have no desire to start keeping work in process (regardless of when I last looked at it) off Wiki.
PЄTЄRS
JVЄСRUМВА ► TALK 19:36, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- The "discussion" has nothing to do with the article (or my saving Latvian language content) for future use. If/once deleted, I will then be forced to request it be recreated in my user space where it is now citing my inactivity for reasons explained. I would suggest you upgrade your bot (or procedure) to do courtesy notices with some "if not responded by, article will be nominated for deletion per XYZ" to avoid causing editors to expend effort as here. I have no desire to start keeping work in process (regardless of when I last looked at it) off Wiki.
PЄTЄRS
- Blank or redirect to the mainspace article. As the user is topic banned, it is best that he doesn't maintain live any content subject to the ban. Any editor in good standing, with respect to the topic, may merge the content (subject to consensus), or suggest merging on the mainspace talk page. --
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 05:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment If you simply wait for another 10 days, I can take care of whatever I intended to do with the content regarding article mainspace or add to it so it is no longer stale, problem solved. That seems a lot simpler for everyone else. As I did not work on the content while topic banned there is no issue regarding it being in my user space.
PЄTЄRS
JVЄСRUМВА ► TALK 20:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment If you simply wait for another 10 days, I can take care of whatever I intended to do with the content regarding article mainspace or add to it so it is no longer stale, problem solved. That seems a lot simpler for everyone else. As I did not work on the content while topic banned there is no issue regarding it being in my user space.
PЄTЄRS
- Redirect and Close I merged the content as suggested. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Redirect to the article that now contains the content formerly found on this page. -- RL0919 ( talk) 02:31, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
User:Vecrumba/SovietJewishLatvia
Personal archived version of content such might be found in Jews in Latvia - Soviet occupation, 1940–1941 is disfavored per WP:STALEDRAFT. -- Uzma Gamal ( talk) 23:59, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete You've found quite a few of these today. :) ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 00:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment It's "stale" because I'm currently topic banned in the area encompassing the article. Please un-nominate.
PЄTЄRS
JVЄСRUМВА ► TALK 02:59, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Since there has been discussion on the page after the MfD nomination, the nomination can't be withdrawn. The last edit on the page was 19 May 2007. --
Uzma Gamal (
talk) 13:29, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- The "discussion" has nothing to do with the article (or my saving Latvian language content) for future use. If/once deleted, I will then be forced to request it be recreated in my user space where it is now citing my inactivity for reasons explained. I would suggest you upgrade your bot (or procedure) to do courtesy notices with some "if not responded by, article will be nominated for deletion per XYZ" to avoid causing editors to expend effort as here. I have no desire to start keeping work in process (regardless of when I last looked at it) off Wiki.
PЄTЄRS
JVЄСRUМВА ► TALK 19:36, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- The "discussion" has nothing to do with the article (or my saving Latvian language content) for future use. If/once deleted, I will then be forced to request it be recreated in my user space where it is now citing my inactivity for reasons explained. I would suggest you upgrade your bot (or procedure) to do courtesy notices with some "if not responded by, article will be nominated for deletion per XYZ" to avoid causing editors to expend effort as here. I have no desire to start keeping work in process (regardless of when I last looked at it) off Wiki.
PЄTЄRS
- Blank or redirect to the mainspace article. As the user is topic banned, it is best that he doesn't maintain live any content subject to the ban. Any editor in good standing, with respect to the topic, may merge the content (subject to consensus), or suggest merging on the mainspace talk page. --
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 05:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment If you simply wait for another 10 days, I can take care of whatever I intended to do with the content regarding article mainspace or add to it so it is no longer stale, problem solved. That seems a lot simpler for everyone else. As I did not work on the content while topic banned there is no issue regarding it being in my user space.
PЄTЄRS
JVЄСRUМВА ► TALK 20:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment If you simply wait for another 10 days, I can take care of whatever I intended to do with the content regarding article mainspace or add to it so it is no longer stale, problem solved. That seems a lot simpler for everyone else. As I did not work on the content while topic banned there is no issue regarding it being in my user space.
PЄTЄRS
- Redirect and Close I merged the content as suggested. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.