From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Mainspace . Again per Mendaliv, as with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Valoem/Bonsall UFOPMC(talk) 04:56, 11 January 2018 (UTC) reply

User:Valoem/Hopeh Incident ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) Killiondude ( talk) 03:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC) reply

WP:STALEDRAFT. Originally was an article deleted from mainspace, then userfied, but no activity or improvement after 2 years. Doubtful that any new sources will arise that would enable this to move from a fringe-sourced stub to mainspace. LuckyLouie ( talk) 23:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. A sourced incident. If not notable, mergable. No reason to delete. — SmokeyJoe ( talk) 03:26, 27 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep and close LuckyLouie has shown a bias against fringe related topics. I am allowed to retain such articles in my user space. Please close discussion and retain article. WP:NODEADLINE. Valoem talk contrib 18:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC) reply
    • Umm, "I am allowed to retain such articles in my user space". "Retain" is the wrong word. It sounds like you think you can keep it there as-is permanently. No. You must at least have some intention of doing something with it. It must have some purpose. If the best you can say is less than that, you should blank the page during inactivity. There are no time limits, but there must be intention. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 02:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - This has sat in Valoem's userspace for a good 2 years and 3 days after Valoem's !vote it's still sat there - They have no interest in doing anything with it and I don't see why it should sit there for the next 5 years .... either you're going to improve it and move it back or you're not ... Valoem clearly isn't so deletion is our only option. – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:30, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude ( talk) 03:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Mainspace . Again per Mendaliv, as with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Valoem/Bonsall UFOPMC(talk) 04:56, 11 January 2018 (UTC) reply

User:Valoem/Hopeh Incident ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) Killiondude ( talk) 03:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC) reply

WP:STALEDRAFT. Originally was an article deleted from mainspace, then userfied, but no activity or improvement after 2 years. Doubtful that any new sources will arise that would enable this to move from a fringe-sourced stub to mainspace. LuckyLouie ( talk) 23:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. A sourced incident. If not notable, mergable. No reason to delete. — SmokeyJoe ( talk) 03:26, 27 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep and close LuckyLouie has shown a bias against fringe related topics. I am allowed to retain such articles in my user space. Please close discussion and retain article. WP:NODEADLINE. Valoem talk contrib 18:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC) reply
    • Umm, "I am allowed to retain such articles in my user space". "Retain" is the wrong word. It sounds like you think you can keep it there as-is permanently. No. You must at least have some intention of doing something with it. It must have some purpose. If the best you can say is less than that, you should blank the page during inactivity. There are no time limits, but there must be intention. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 02:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - This has sat in Valoem's userspace for a good 2 years and 3 days after Valoem's !vote it's still sat there - They have no interest in doing anything with it and I don't see why it should sit there for the next 5 years .... either you're going to improve it and move it back or you're not ... Valoem clearly isn't so deletion is our only option. – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:30, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude ( talk) 03:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook