From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠ PMC(talk) 04:52, 11 January 2018 (UTC) reply

User:Valoem/Charlie Redstar

User:Valoem/Charlie Redstar ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) Killiondude ( talk) 03:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC) reply

WP:STALEDRAFT. Originally was a mainspace article that got AfD'd then userfied, but no activity and no improvement for more than 2 years. Lack of independent sources aside from UFO crowd make it impossible to move to mainspace. Now simply exists as a WP:FAKEARTICLE. LuckyLouie ( talk) 22:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Keep and close LuckyLouie has shown a bias against fringe related topics. I am allowed to retain such articles in my user space. Please close discussion and retain article. WP:NODEADLINE. Valoem talk contrib 18:30, 27 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep—per Valoem. Nikolaiho ☎️ 📖 03:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - This has sat in Valoem's userspace for a good 2 years and 3 days after Valoem's !vote it's still sat there - They have no interest in doing anything with it and I don't see why it should sit there for the next 5 years .... either you're going to improve it and move it back or you're not ... Valoem clearly isn't so deletion is our only option. – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude ( talk) 03:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Stale draft without useful content or sources. Otherwise I'd suggest mainspacing and redirecting to List of reported UFO sightings. This content would not be helpful for that list article. —/ Mendaliv/ / Δ's/ 16:15, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as per nom and User:Davey2010. No need to keep indefinitely. -- P 1 9 9   21:30, 10 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠ PMC(talk) 04:52, 11 January 2018 (UTC) reply

User:Valoem/Charlie Redstar

User:Valoem/Charlie Redstar ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) Killiondude ( talk) 03:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC) reply

WP:STALEDRAFT. Originally was a mainspace article that got AfD'd then userfied, but no activity and no improvement for more than 2 years. Lack of independent sources aside from UFO crowd make it impossible to move to mainspace. Now simply exists as a WP:FAKEARTICLE. LuckyLouie ( talk) 22:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Keep and close LuckyLouie has shown a bias against fringe related topics. I am allowed to retain such articles in my user space. Please close discussion and retain article. WP:NODEADLINE. Valoem talk contrib 18:30, 27 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep—per Valoem. Nikolaiho ☎️ 📖 03:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - This has sat in Valoem's userspace for a good 2 years and 3 days after Valoem's !vote it's still sat there - They have no interest in doing anything with it and I don't see why it should sit there for the next 5 years .... either you're going to improve it and move it back or you're not ... Valoem clearly isn't so deletion is our only option. – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude ( talk) 03:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Stale draft without useful content or sources. Otherwise I'd suggest mainspacing and redirecting to List of reported UFO sightings. This content would not be helpful for that list article. —/ Mendaliv/ / Δ's/ 16:15, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as per nom and User:Davey2010. No need to keep indefinitely. -- P 1 9 9   21:30, 10 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook