- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Since the user in question is blocked, all his stuff should go. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:38, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Personal attacks should not be 'removed' in most circumstances. This template is against policy. Asenine 12:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete for two reasons. First, while "[r]emoving unquestionable personal attacks from your own user talk page is rarely a matter of concern[, o]n other talk pages ... removal should typically be limited." (quoted from Wikipedia:No personal attacks#Removal of text) Second, one can easily indicate the removal of a personal attack without the use of a userspace template and big red Xs, which actually serve to draw more attention to the personal attack, thereby undermining the purpose of the removal. – Black Falcon ( Talk) 19:20, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Open to abuse. MBisanz talk 03:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Too obnoxious-looking to be helpful. Mr. Z-man 04:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - As per BF (Black Falcon). -- SkyWalker ( talk) 09:49, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, user has been indef blocked (see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/The Twenty Thousand Tonne Bomb) and all user subpages deleted except these two currently being discussed. -- Stormie ( talk) 11:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete simply adds clutter to a page when the point is to clean it up. Open to abuse. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 17:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Good faith ideas should normally be kept, but this is such a bad idea (would serve to inflame), and contains negligible substance for reference. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 13:54, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Since the user in question is blocked, all his stuff should go. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:38, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Personal attacks should not be 'removed' in most circumstances. This template is against policy. Asenine 12:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete for two reasons. First, while "[r]emoving unquestionable personal attacks from your own user talk page is rarely a matter of concern[, o]n other talk pages ... removal should typically be limited." (quoted from Wikipedia:No personal attacks#Removal of text) Second, one can easily indicate the removal of a personal attack without the use of a userspace template and big red Xs, which actually serve to draw more attention to the personal attack, thereby undermining the purpose of the removal. – Black Falcon ( Talk) 19:20, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Open to abuse. MBisanz talk 03:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Too obnoxious-looking to be helpful. Mr. Z-man 04:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - As per BF (Black Falcon). -- SkyWalker ( talk) 09:49, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, user has been indef blocked (see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/The Twenty Thousand Tonne Bomb) and all user subpages deleted except these two currently being discussed. -- Stormie ( talk) 11:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete simply adds clutter to a page when the point is to clean it up. Open to abuse. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 17:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Good faith ideas should normally be kept, but this is such a bad idea (would serve to inflame), and contains negligible substance for reference. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 13:54, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.