The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment - Joke or not, it is inflammatory and keeping it would give a rather bad idea of what we promote at Wikipedia - which is certainly not this public hatred of editors. Asenine 18:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)reply
You've got to be kidding me. You do realize it is about "hating" the editor who created it right? I don't find this inflammatory in the least. We're no longer allowed to use the word "hate?" When did Wikipedia become the
thought police? Mr.Z-man19:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC)reply
The userbox is not vocal about who created it. If someone sees this on someone's page they are more likely to think that it is acceptable in general than not. Asenine 20:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete per Angus and Stormie. The "harmless" argument doesn't hold as much weight when the user is indef-blocked; if by some chance s/he should be unblocked at some time in the future, the pages can be restored without too much hassle. –Black Falcon(
Talk)16:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment - Joke or not, it is inflammatory and keeping it would give a rather bad idea of what we promote at Wikipedia - which is certainly not this public hatred of editors. Asenine 18:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)reply
You've got to be kidding me. You do realize it is about "hating" the editor who created it right? I don't find this inflammatory in the least. We're no longer allowed to use the word "hate?" When did Wikipedia become the
thought police? Mr.Z-man19:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC)reply
The userbox is not vocal about who created it. If someone sees this on someone's page they are more likely to think that it is acceptable in general than not. Asenine 20:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete per Angus and Stormie. The "harmless" argument doesn't hold as much weight when the user is indef-blocked; if by some chance s/he should be unblocked at some time in the future, the pages can be restored without too much hassle. –Black Falcon(
Talk)16:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.