- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Delete all, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:55, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- User:Tedius Zanarukando/Userboxes/User Jeopardy third place
- User:Tedius Zanarukando/Userboxes/User Jeopardy second place
- User:Tedius Zanarukando/Userboxes/User Jeopardy champion
These four userboxen have almost no transclusions after four years of usage. All four showed up on the userpage of someone who claimed to have been a [not filled in]-day champion, in second place, in third place, and disqualified before Final Jeopardy!, which of course is impossible unless you're Jeff Kirby. Said user's only edits were crapflooding his userpage with userboxen. Beyond that, there were only two transclusions anywhere: one of the second-place userbox that's perfectly legitimate, and one that came from another user whose sole edit was crapflooding his userpage with userboxen.
I am working on a userbox at User:TenPoundHammer/User game show contestant, which (when complete) will allow for more versatile phrasing and allow a user to say he or she was a winning/losing/whatever-placing contestant on any game show, that he or she won x dollars, etc. I feel that an all-inclusive userbox (or multiple if need be) is a better solution than having four userboxen for Jeopardy! alone, especially given the almost non-usage of the Jeopardy! boxen. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:00, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per above, overly specific, TenPound's solution better. Herostratus ( talk) 18:05, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, the otters have a much better idea. Nyttend ( talk) 20:52, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete although I assume the better idea came from the clue-bat.-- SPhilbrick T 01:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Delete all, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:55, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- User:Tedius Zanarukando/Userboxes/User Jeopardy third place
- User:Tedius Zanarukando/Userboxes/User Jeopardy second place
- User:Tedius Zanarukando/Userboxes/User Jeopardy champion
These four userboxen have almost no transclusions after four years of usage. All four showed up on the userpage of someone who claimed to have been a [not filled in]-day champion, in second place, in third place, and disqualified before Final Jeopardy!, which of course is impossible unless you're Jeff Kirby. Said user's only edits were crapflooding his userpage with userboxen. Beyond that, there were only two transclusions anywhere: one of the second-place userbox that's perfectly legitimate, and one that came from another user whose sole edit was crapflooding his userpage with userboxen.
I am working on a userbox at User:TenPoundHammer/User game show contestant, which (when complete) will allow for more versatile phrasing and allow a user to say he or she was a winning/losing/whatever-placing contestant on any game show, that he or she won x dollars, etc. I feel that an all-inclusive userbox (or multiple if need be) is a better solution than having four userboxen for Jeopardy! alone, especially given the almost non-usage of the Jeopardy! boxen. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:00, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per above, overly specific, TenPound's solution better. Herostratus ( talk) 18:05, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, the otters have a much better idea. Nyttend ( talk) 20:52, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete although I assume the better idea came from the clue-bat.-- SPhilbrick T 01:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.