The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Speedy keep I was under the impression that users are allowed to have whatever they want in their userspace as long as it is civil, not libelous, and not copyrighted.
J.delanoygabsadds20:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep The nom reason is not valid in my opinion as there are no restrictions on how much space an editor may use in his/her userspace.
Thingg⊕⊗21:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep - as long as the userboxes in question do not violate policy by being offensive or divisive there are no grounds to delete them. Users have broad latitude in their userspaces. Nominator - please explain how these userboxes are against policy or hurting the project. In the absence of either policy violation or project damage there are ZERO grounds for deletion here.
Exxolon (
talk)
21:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep. Nothing really against
WP:U here, so I'm not seeing a real reason to delete. Also somewhat concerned that the nom may have had something to do with
this. --
Bfigura(
talk)21:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Speedy keep I was under the impression that users are allowed to have whatever they want in their userspace as long as it is civil, not libelous, and not copyrighted.
J.delanoygabsadds20:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep The nom reason is not valid in my opinion as there are no restrictions on how much space an editor may use in his/her userspace.
Thingg⊕⊗21:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep - as long as the userboxes in question do not violate policy by being offensive or divisive there are no grounds to delete them. Users have broad latitude in their userspaces. Nominator - please explain how these userboxes are against policy or hurting the project. In the absence of either policy violation or project damage there are ZERO grounds for deletion here.
Exxolon (
talk)
21:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep. Nothing really against
WP:U here, so I'm not seeing a real reason to delete. Also somewhat concerned that the nom may have had something to do with
this. --
Bfigura(
talk)21:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.