- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Speedied per below. Newyorkbrad ( talk) 09:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
User:Od Mishehu and BWilson Suck Dick
Speedy deletion nomination was declined. Both the user and user talk pages are a violation of WP:NPA and WP:G10 and have no content aside from notices that the user has been blocked. Partofthemachine ( talk) 22:54, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Keep. In the edit history of this user page and the talk page, I cannot see any of the attacks that this user has made. It is not clear what about this page, or any previous revision of it (that I am able to see) violates WP:NPA. There's just that this user has been blocked, and why, and also a declined unblock request, all of which seem like reasonable things to keep as public record, and none of which should be deleted. Even if a previous revision was a personal attack, the current revision, declaring that the user is blocked and for what reason, does not violate any policy that I'm aware of. If any previous revision was in violation, the solution would be revision deletion, and if that was necessary, it seems to have already happened. I may change my mind if it is further elaborated as to what specific content is in violation. silvia (BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) ( inquire within) 00:15, 3 February 2023 (UTC)- It's the username itself (and by extension the title of the page) that is a personal attack. There is also already a rough consensus to delete these sorts of pages, because they sometimes show up when you search for the user. Partofthemachine ( talk) 00:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as obvious harassment and trolling. Dronebogus ( talk) 08:49, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, the page being searchable and the title showing is already a personal attack, so G10 and do not bring to MfD. —
Alalch E. 10:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- possibly helpful if @ Bbb23 explains the decline. If not for that by a respected editor, I might have speedied. Star Mississippi 20:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Why is this here?-- ⛵ WaltClipper -( talk) 14:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete obviously - this should have been speedied and I'm tempted to do it myself. Hut 8.5 18:42, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- I already explained my reasoning on my Talk page if anyone wants to look, but, really, I don't care if someone wants to delete it without waiting for a consensus in this discussion. Silly if you ask me, but whatever.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 20:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Speedied per below. Newyorkbrad ( talk) 09:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
User:Od Mishehu and BWilson Suck Dick
Speedy deletion nomination was declined. Both the user and user talk pages are a violation of WP:NPA and WP:G10 and have no content aside from notices that the user has been blocked. Partofthemachine ( talk) 22:54, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Keep. In the edit history of this user page and the talk page, I cannot see any of the attacks that this user has made. It is not clear what about this page, or any previous revision of it (that I am able to see) violates WP:NPA. There's just that this user has been blocked, and why, and also a declined unblock request, all of which seem like reasonable things to keep as public record, and none of which should be deleted. Even if a previous revision was a personal attack, the current revision, declaring that the user is blocked and for what reason, does not violate any policy that I'm aware of. If any previous revision was in violation, the solution would be revision deletion, and if that was necessary, it seems to have already happened. I may change my mind if it is further elaborated as to what specific content is in violation. silvia (BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) ( inquire within) 00:15, 3 February 2023 (UTC)- It's the username itself (and by extension the title of the page) that is a personal attack. There is also already a rough consensus to delete these sorts of pages, because they sometimes show up when you search for the user. Partofthemachine ( talk) 00:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as obvious harassment and trolling. Dronebogus ( talk) 08:49, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, the page being searchable and the title showing is already a personal attack, so G10 and do not bring to MfD. —
Alalch E. 10:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- possibly helpful if @ Bbb23 explains the decline. If not for that by a respected editor, I might have speedied. Star Mississippi 20:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Why is this here?-- ⛵ WaltClipper -( talk) 14:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete obviously - this should have been speedied and I'm tempted to do it myself. Hut 8.5 18:42, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- I already explained my reasoning on my Talk page if anyone wants to look, but, really, I don't care if someone wants to delete it without waiting for a consensus in this discussion. Silly if you ask me, but whatever.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 20:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.