The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Offensive and inflammatory userbox, with possible BLP concerns. This userbox seems to be implying that the conspiracy theories involving the death of Vince Foster have truth, and that someone killed him. BLP applies to userboxes, doesn't it?
Lawrence Cohen00:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)reply
I can see no valid argument to keep such a template, and it appears to be offensive and inflammatory, both unacceptable in any sort of template. Delete. Spebi00:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete (unsurprisingly to anyone who saw the ANI conversation leading to this nomination). Personally I wouldn't even bother with the discussion and just
T1 it, but now the discussion's started it may as well run. —
iridescent00:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Offensive and inflammatory userbox, with possible BLP concerns. This userbox seems to be implying that the conspiracy theories involving the death of Vince Foster have truth, and that someone killed him. BLP applies to userboxes, doesn't it?
Lawrence Cohen00:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)reply
I can see no valid argument to keep such a template, and it appears to be offensive and inflammatory, both unacceptable in any sort of template. Delete. Spebi00:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete (unsurprisingly to anyone who saw the ANI conversation leading to this nomination). Personally I wouldn't even bother with the discussion and just
T1 it, but now the discussion's started it may as well run. —
iridescent00:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.