- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD ( talk) 20:15, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
User:Nicholance/Liam Hackett
WP:STALEDRAFT of an article removed by AFD over a year ago. jcgoble3 ( talk) 05:49, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
I disputed the relevance of the page originally, I'm okay for you to go ahead and delete it. Robertshippey ( talk) 11:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
I agree that the page User:Nicholance/Liam Hackett has been inactive for quite some time because I was away for University, but right now I've finally got time to improve the page to hopefully to revive the page back to the original link Liam Hackett. I would appreciate if the page could be KEPT and not be deleted so that I could further develop it to hopefully revive it, but I would also kindly note that it might take some time to improve and further develop the page to hopefully be brought back to the main link Liam Hackett. I am still new when it comes to dealing with reviving deleted articles, therefore any suggestions or assistance given to me to help with reviving the article will be very much appreciated, thank you in advance. Nicholance ( talk) 13:26, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep for the moment, because Nicholance has expressed an intention to work on the subpage. There is nothing stopping you from editing the page right now but you have to demonstrate that you are working on it even if it takes you a while to get it right. Please don't move it back until you have addressed the concerns expressed in the previous AfD. However, I will support deletion if few or no content edits with reliable sources are made in the near future. Green Giant ( talk) 01:41, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep for now – for reasons described above by Green Giant. Libby norman ( talk) 19:33, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD ( talk) 20:15, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
User:Nicholance/Liam Hackett
WP:STALEDRAFT of an article removed by AFD over a year ago. jcgoble3 ( talk) 05:49, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
I disputed the relevance of the page originally, I'm okay for you to go ahead and delete it. Robertshippey ( talk) 11:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
I agree that the page User:Nicholance/Liam Hackett has been inactive for quite some time because I was away for University, but right now I've finally got time to improve the page to hopefully to revive the page back to the original link Liam Hackett. I would appreciate if the page could be KEPT and not be deleted so that I could further develop it to hopefully revive it, but I would also kindly note that it might take some time to improve and further develop the page to hopefully be brought back to the main link Liam Hackett. I am still new when it comes to dealing with reviving deleted articles, therefore any suggestions or assistance given to me to help with reviving the article will be very much appreciated, thank you in advance. Nicholance ( talk) 13:26, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep for the moment, because Nicholance has expressed an intention to work on the subpage. There is nothing stopping you from editing the page right now but you have to demonstrate that you are working on it even if it takes you a while to get it right. Please don't move it back until you have addressed the concerns expressed in the previous AfD. However, I will support deletion if few or no content edits with reliable sources are made in the near future. Green Giant ( talk) 01:41, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep for now – for reasons described above by Green Giant. Libby norman ( talk) 19:33, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.