- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Anna Frodesiak - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/NCAA_91. JohnCD ( talk) 09:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
User:NCAA Season 91
Likely fails WP:ORIGINAL and/or Wikipedia:Notability per Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Volleyball/Archive 1#Some drafts to sort out Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 12:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep this is clearly an active draft work by an editor who has clearly labeled it a draft and not an article. There may be an issue with the user name matching the future proposed article title, but that can be fixed administratively through renaming/etc. I see no policy violation. Not a deletion issue.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 13:35, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, I added {{
userspace draft}} but then found more that were possibly related. The users are very new, and haven't edited elsewhere. I'm not sure if the user was making something for the mainspace or simply using Wikipedia for webhosting, thus violating
WP:FAKEARTICLE. I just wasn't sure what else to do. That is why I posted at project volleyball. When I got feedback, I thought MfD would be easiest way to handle these. Perhaps I should have posted at each of the talk pages asking whether or not they were preparing something for the mainspace. Sorry for any trouble I've caused with these.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk)
14:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- It never hurts to report even if you suspect. You could be right, I might be wrong (that happens a lot). If it's a fake article, it needs to go.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 16:02, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, I added {{
userspace draft}} but then found more that were possibly related. The users are very new, and haven't edited elsewhere. I'm not sure if the user was making something for the mainspace or simply using Wikipedia for webhosting, thus violating
WP:FAKEARTICLE. I just wasn't sure what else to do. That is why I posted at project volleyball. When I got feedback, I thought MfD would be easiest way to handle these. Perhaps I should have posted at each of the talk pages asking whether or not they were preparing something for the mainspace. Sorry for any trouble I've caused with these.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk)
14:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- My apologies. I should have been more clear when nominating these. And yes, there are so many of these webhosting items. I often ask at their talk, and just get ignored or bushed off by the user. Here is the last one I encountered:
- Again, sorry for rushing to MfD before exhausting other ways. I've just had such poor results in the past when trying to communicate with users about seeming FAKEARTICLE/NOTWEBHOSTING matters. Best, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:50, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- On thing that prompted me with this NCAA Season 91 case is that two users edited it (NCAA Season 91 and UAAP 77) without ever communicating with each other at enwp. This is a clue that they are probably talking at some social media site, making it more likely that this may be a NOTWEBHOSTING case. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 01:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete everything as hoaxes. NCAA Season 89 just finished. The next season, NCAA Season 90, begins this June. Ergo, this is made up. – H T D 01:33, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Anna Frodesiak - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/NCAA_91. JohnCD ( talk) 09:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
User:NCAA Season 91
Likely fails WP:ORIGINAL and/or Wikipedia:Notability per Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Volleyball/Archive 1#Some drafts to sort out Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 12:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep this is clearly an active draft work by an editor who has clearly labeled it a draft and not an article. There may be an issue with the user name matching the future proposed article title, but that can be fixed administratively through renaming/etc. I see no policy violation. Not a deletion issue.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 13:35, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, I added {{
userspace draft}} but then found more that were possibly related. The users are very new, and haven't edited elsewhere. I'm not sure if the user was making something for the mainspace or simply using Wikipedia for webhosting, thus violating
WP:FAKEARTICLE. I just wasn't sure what else to do. That is why I posted at project volleyball. When I got feedback, I thought MfD would be easiest way to handle these. Perhaps I should have posted at each of the talk pages asking whether or not they were preparing something for the mainspace. Sorry for any trouble I've caused with these.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk)
14:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- It never hurts to report even if you suspect. You could be right, I might be wrong (that happens a lot). If it's a fake article, it needs to go.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 16:02, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, I added {{
userspace draft}} but then found more that were possibly related. The users are very new, and haven't edited elsewhere. I'm not sure if the user was making something for the mainspace or simply using Wikipedia for webhosting, thus violating
WP:FAKEARTICLE. I just wasn't sure what else to do. That is why I posted at project volleyball. When I got feedback, I thought MfD would be easiest way to handle these. Perhaps I should have posted at each of the talk pages asking whether or not they were preparing something for the mainspace. Sorry for any trouble I've caused with these.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk)
14:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- My apologies. I should have been more clear when nominating these. And yes, there are so many of these webhosting items. I often ask at their talk, and just get ignored or bushed off by the user. Here is the last one I encountered:
- Again, sorry for rushing to MfD before exhausting other ways. I've just had such poor results in the past when trying to communicate with users about seeming FAKEARTICLE/NOTWEBHOSTING matters. Best, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:50, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- On thing that prompted me with this NCAA Season 91 case is that two users edited it (NCAA Season 91 and UAAP 77) without ever communicating with each other at enwp. This is a clue that they are probably talking at some social media site, making it more likely that this may be a NOTWEBHOSTING case. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 01:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete everything as hoaxes. NCAA Season 89 just finished. The next season, NCAA Season 90, begins this June. Ergo, this is made up. – H T D 01:33, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.