- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Speedy Close and Delete; consensus formed quick here... — xaosflux Talk 03:14, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
This userbox is against wp:user image guidelines (nudity).
User who created this has been blocked for two years for uploading an image of an alleged image of 16 year old female (reportedly of the user) masturbating. See [ here] for ANI. Stillwaterising ( talk) 01:58, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Not useful for the encyclopedia. Whatever the intention, the only usage outcome would be disruption/trolling. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:46, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused and unneeded. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 03:00, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. ~ NerdyScienceDude ( ✉ • ✐) 03:23, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- "Yeah but no but yeah but no but..." definitely no. Jack Merridew 03:57, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete What a decay of using this free encyclopedia for so many readers, who are glad to have these contributions to their knowledge undertaken by volunteers.-- Fox1942 ( talk) 16:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete solely on the basis that it is an inappropriate user box, not, for the record, to be taken as a comment that the image itself is inappropriate. – ukexpat ( talk) 15:08, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete A disruptive userbox. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:58, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Speedy Close and Delete; consensus formed quick here... — xaosflux Talk 03:14, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
This userbox is against wp:user image guidelines (nudity).
User who created this has been blocked for two years for uploading an image of an alleged image of 16 year old female (reportedly of the user) masturbating. See [ here] for ANI. Stillwaterising ( talk) 01:58, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Not useful for the encyclopedia. Whatever the intention, the only usage outcome would be disruption/trolling. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:46, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete: Unused and unneeded. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 03:00, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. ~ NerdyScienceDude ( ✉ • ✐) 03:23, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- "Yeah but no but yeah but no but..." definitely no. Jack Merridew 03:57, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete What a decay of using this free encyclopedia for so many readers, who are glad to have these contributions to their knowledge undertaken by volunteers.-- Fox1942 ( talk) 16:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete solely on the basis that it is an inappropriate user box, not, for the record, to be taken as a comment that the image itself is inappropriate. – ukexpat ( talk) 15:08, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete A disruptive userbox. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:58, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.