- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:54, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
User:Kendwallace/TejonVillage
Delete sandbox of indef blocked sockpuppet. Binksternet ( talk) 18:31, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Move to Wikiproject: Could get better at Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts. Move to Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/TejonVillage. We shouldn't delete an userspace draft just because its abandoned or stale! It has potential for being in mainspace. ~~ Ebe123~~ (+) talkI didn't notice, delete. ~~ Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs 20:53, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Contribs 11:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- There's already an article: Tejon Mountain Village. The draft is not needed. Binksternet ( talk) 21:18, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - The article already exists; there is no reason to keep it. Also, Ebe, it says on
WP:ABANDON#Scope:
So, if the mainspace article didn't already exist, it still shouldn't go to WP:ABANDON, per the scope specified. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 21:45, 29 August 2011 (UTC)"Any article drafts that are kept in userspace by users who are utilizing the Retired template for articles that have no equivalent article in mainspace. This project will also allow donation of drafts from users who do not feel like they are up to finishing them or have lost interest in the subject of the draft."
- The scope has expanded and has took many stale drafts by inactive users. I updated the scope specified. ~~
Ebe123~~ (+)
talk
Contribs 11:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)- Well, there it is. :) ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 18:58, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- The scope has expanded and has took many stale drafts by inactive users. I updated the scope specified. ~~
Ebe123~~ (+)
talk
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:54, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
User:Kendwallace/TejonVillage
Delete sandbox of indef blocked sockpuppet. Binksternet ( talk) 18:31, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Move to Wikiproject: Could get better at Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts. Move to Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/TejonVillage. We shouldn't delete an userspace draft just because its abandoned or stale! It has potential for being in mainspace. ~~ Ebe123~~ (+) talkI didn't notice, delete. ~~ Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs 20:53, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Contribs 11:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- There's already an article: Tejon Mountain Village. The draft is not needed. Binksternet ( talk) 21:18, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - The article already exists; there is no reason to keep it. Also, Ebe, it says on
WP:ABANDON#Scope:
So, if the mainspace article didn't already exist, it still shouldn't go to WP:ABANDON, per the scope specified. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 21:45, 29 August 2011 (UTC)"Any article drafts that are kept in userspace by users who are utilizing the Retired template for articles that have no equivalent article in mainspace. This project will also allow donation of drafts from users who do not feel like they are up to finishing them or have lost interest in the subject of the draft."
- The scope has expanded and has took many stale drafts by inactive users. I updated the scope specified. ~~
Ebe123~~ (+)
talk
Contribs 11:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)- Well, there it is. :) ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 18:58, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- The scope has expanded and has took many stale drafts by inactive users. I updated the scope specified. ~~
Ebe123~~ (+)
talk
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.