- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Blank Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 19:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Inappropriate use of user space. Wikipedia is not a job board. It's not a place to place one's résumé. Bringing here as speedy deletion was declined. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 01:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Weak delete, strong blank - This seems to be a set of credentials, ie a resume. I don't see any other edits by this user. I also don't see how a set of credentials dropped on Wikipedia in 2007(and then the account never used again) is helpful to Wikipedia. I suppose it is possible that this user was collecting research(exclusively of works he was involved in) to do an article in 2007 and has yet to come back and finish. I doubt it, I think it is a resume posting to get a job, but it is possible. Chillum 02:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- This guy is sufficiently notable and high-powered that I don't think he has to come here to post a resume for a job. I'd say everyone in his field knows him and how to find him. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs) 15:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep This is not in the category of advertisement as it is a list of publications not a full resume, that may even be useful in some way to wikipedia, although I don't see how. This user needs to be educated. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 05:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep, but remove most of the material. It is not clear whether this is Professor Kimon P. Valavanis, or a fan of his. The professor is arguably notable. This could be material intended to support a real article. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 08:44, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep C.v.s have a special place in userspace -- I suppose a list of publications which is clearly non-commerical fits the same general category. He is apparently well noted in robotics, so if this were intended as a resource for a future article, the question of deletion would be even clearer. Collect ( talk) 13:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Blank for now and leave a very nice, solicitous note on the talk page explaining some CV material is OK but only for active editors making non-COI edits. It would be great if we could get this expert [1] writing content. (I'd be happy if he just coerced his grad students into doing it!) -- A. B. ( talk • contribs) 15:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Cited in one of our articles, Business agility, for what it's worth. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs) 15:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - It's a bibliography, doesn't appear to meet spam or advertising criteria. Blanking would be fine, but I see no reason for deletion. Raven1977 Talk to me My edits 22:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Blank Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 19:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Inappropriate use of user space. Wikipedia is not a job board. It's not a place to place one's résumé. Bringing here as speedy deletion was declined. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 01:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Weak delete, strong blank - This seems to be a set of credentials, ie a resume. I don't see any other edits by this user. I also don't see how a set of credentials dropped on Wikipedia in 2007(and then the account never used again) is helpful to Wikipedia. I suppose it is possible that this user was collecting research(exclusively of works he was involved in) to do an article in 2007 and has yet to come back and finish. I doubt it, I think it is a resume posting to get a job, but it is possible. Chillum 02:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- This guy is sufficiently notable and high-powered that I don't think he has to come here to post a resume for a job. I'd say everyone in his field knows him and how to find him. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs) 15:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep This is not in the category of advertisement as it is a list of publications not a full resume, that may even be useful in some way to wikipedia, although I don't see how. This user needs to be educated. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 05:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep, but remove most of the material. It is not clear whether this is Professor Kimon P. Valavanis, or a fan of his. The professor is arguably notable. This could be material intended to support a real article. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 08:44, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep C.v.s have a special place in userspace -- I suppose a list of publications which is clearly non-commerical fits the same general category. He is apparently well noted in robotics, so if this were intended as a resource for a future article, the question of deletion would be even clearer. Collect ( talk) 13:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Blank for now and leave a very nice, solicitous note on the talk page explaining some CV material is OK but only for active editors making non-COI edits. It would be great if we could get this expert [1] writing content. (I'd be happy if he just coerced his grad students into doing it!) -- A. B. ( talk • contribs) 15:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Cited in one of our articles, Business agility, for what it's worth. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs) 15:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - It's a bibliography, doesn't appear to meet spam or advertising criteria. Blanking would be fine, but I see no reason for deletion. Raven1977 Talk to me My edits 22:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.