The result of the discussion was No further actions needed. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 15:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
The owner of this sandbox is being disruptive by reposting non-free images on the page. I've had to spend a lot of time on bringing this page in compliance with policy, but this apparently doesn't work as the owner of the sandbox brings the page into non-compliance with policy more or less immediately after fixing the page. We can't have pages which violate policy, and if the page can't be made to comply with policy, then the only remaining option is deletion of the page. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:41, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Guys, I'd like to note that these logos are compliant and in the public domain: this, this, this, this and this.
On the other hand, this one uses a Creative Commons licensing.
I've detected now that the KKE logo ( this one) was indeed copyrighted, have removed it and will proceed to remove this from any other page that uses it. However, I don't see what is the problem with the remainder of these. Or, in other words, there was one remaining image with a non-free licensing in the article. The suggestion to solve this, on Stefan2's opinion, is to delete the whole article. Which would not be required anyway, since the issue has been solved. Impru20 ( talk) 13:08, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was No further actions needed. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 15:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
The owner of this sandbox is being disruptive by reposting non-free images on the page. I've had to spend a lot of time on bringing this page in compliance with policy, but this apparently doesn't work as the owner of the sandbox brings the page into non-compliance with policy more or less immediately after fixing the page. We can't have pages which violate policy, and if the page can't be made to comply with policy, then the only remaining option is deletion of the page. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:41, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Guys, I'd like to note that these logos are compliant and in the public domain: this, this, this, this and this.
On the other hand, this one uses a Creative Commons licensing.
I've detected now that the KKE logo ( this one) was indeed copyrighted, have removed it and will proceed to remove this from any other page that uses it. However, I don't see what is the problem with the remainder of these. Or, in other words, there was one remaining image with a non-free licensing in the article. The suggestion to solve this, on Stefan2's opinion, is to delete the whole article. Which would not be required anyway, since the issue has been solved. Impru20 ( talk) 13:08, 30 March 2016 (UTC)