From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Gwen Gale ( talk) 04:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Violation of WP:USERPAGE; possible sockpuppet of User:Pprice1 and User:Laurenwest99, who unsuccessfully tried to create a page on Scott Walterschied a few days ago [1]. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 02:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Requested G11 speedy. It's blatant advertising/spamming. //  roux    07:21, 30 December 2008 (UTC) reply

I am a in house counsel for Paramount and am fully aware of Mr. Scott Walterschied. How this article is advertising or spam asserted by these 2 users asking for it's deletion, is without any credibility or substance. It is factually acurate and as such (and in compliance with Wikipedia Rules) SHOULD BE PUBLISHED. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carolrubensteinesq ( talkcontribs) 23:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC) reply

I believe we can dismiss the above as obvious SPA. Only edit is to this page. //  roux    23:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I've also left a note on the above account's talkpage explaining both WP:N and WP:NLT/ WP:DOLT. //  roux    23:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC) reply
And I've left a note about how there is no lawyer on the California Bar named Carol Rubenstein [2] -- Mr. Vernon ( talk) 01:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Bwahahahaaahaahaaa. Oh my. I'd ask for a block based on the volume of quacking in the vicinity, but this could turn out to be very funny. //  roux    03:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
I also checked the other two states for shits and giggles...no dice. -- Smashville talk 06:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
I've added her to the increasingly long and (dare I say) hilarious list of possible Pprice1 sockpuppets. Anybody here got checkuser access? -- Mr. Vernon ( talk) 06:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Mr. Vernon I am a member of the New York, Michigan and California Bar and now you are crossing the line. I plan to subpoena Wilkipedia as to your information because you have committed a major error in your accusation which is actionable in a civil suit. In the spirit of the New Year I will settle for a apology on this page asap. -- Carolrubensteinesq ( talk) 05:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Note - Above user indef-blocked for making legal threat. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 05:57, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
I was a member of a bar early tonight...-- Smashville talk 06:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
I passed many bars earlier today and saw some fireworks at midnight. Gwen Gale ( talk) 06:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
It is amazing how badly informed Carolrubenstein is for a lawyer! Almost makes you think maybe she isn't one. Or that you yanks aren't clearing your lawyers properly :P. Ironholds ( talk) 07:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Both, sadly. Oh, and happy new year! Graymornings (talk) 09:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
G4'd, with salt. Gwen Gale ( talk) 03:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Thanks for the quick response. 78.34.151.178 ( talk) 03:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Did Film09 create that article, or was it another "lawyer"? -- Mr. Vernon ( talk) 03:07, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Scott walterschied was created by User:Film09. Gwen Gale ( talk) 03:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Thanks. Just IMHO, it's probably time to ban this user and his socks. [3] -- Mr. Vernon ( talk) 03:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply
CU says they're at most two people, all blocked now. Gwen Gale ( talk) 04:17, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Gwen Gale ( talk) 04:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Violation of WP:USERPAGE; possible sockpuppet of User:Pprice1 and User:Laurenwest99, who unsuccessfully tried to create a page on Scott Walterschied a few days ago [1]. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 02:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Requested G11 speedy. It's blatant advertising/spamming. //  roux    07:21, 30 December 2008 (UTC) reply

I am a in house counsel for Paramount and am fully aware of Mr. Scott Walterschied. How this article is advertising or spam asserted by these 2 users asking for it's deletion, is without any credibility or substance. It is factually acurate and as such (and in compliance with Wikipedia Rules) SHOULD BE PUBLISHED. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carolrubensteinesq ( talkcontribs) 23:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC) reply

I believe we can dismiss the above as obvious SPA. Only edit is to this page. //  roux    23:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I've also left a note on the above account's talkpage explaining both WP:N and WP:NLT/ WP:DOLT. //  roux    23:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC) reply
And I've left a note about how there is no lawyer on the California Bar named Carol Rubenstein [2] -- Mr. Vernon ( talk) 01:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Bwahahahaaahaahaaa. Oh my. I'd ask for a block based on the volume of quacking in the vicinity, but this could turn out to be very funny. //  roux    03:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
I also checked the other two states for shits and giggles...no dice. -- Smashville talk 06:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
I've added her to the increasingly long and (dare I say) hilarious list of possible Pprice1 sockpuppets. Anybody here got checkuser access? -- Mr. Vernon ( talk) 06:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Mr. Vernon I am a member of the New York, Michigan and California Bar and now you are crossing the line. I plan to subpoena Wilkipedia as to your information because you have committed a major error in your accusation which is actionable in a civil suit. In the spirit of the New Year I will settle for a apology on this page asap. -- Carolrubensteinesq ( talk) 05:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Note - Above user indef-blocked for making legal threat. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 05:57, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
I was a member of a bar early tonight...-- Smashville talk 06:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
I passed many bars earlier today and saw some fireworks at midnight. Gwen Gale ( talk) 06:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
It is amazing how badly informed Carolrubenstein is for a lawyer! Almost makes you think maybe she isn't one. Or that you yanks aren't clearing your lawyers properly :P. Ironholds ( talk) 07:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Both, sadly. Oh, and happy new year! Graymornings (talk) 09:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply
G4'd, with salt. Gwen Gale ( talk) 03:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Thanks for the quick response. 78.34.151.178 ( talk) 03:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Did Film09 create that article, or was it another "lawyer"? -- Mr. Vernon ( talk) 03:07, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Scott walterschied was created by User:Film09. Gwen Gale ( talk) 03:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Thanks. Just IMHO, it's probably time to ban this user and his socks. [3] -- Mr. Vernon ( talk) 03:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply
CU says they're at most two people, all blocked now. Gwen Gale ( talk) 04:17, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook