The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I am a in house counsel for Paramount and am fully aware of Mr. Scott Walterschied. How this article is advertising or spam asserted by these 2 users asking for it's deletion, is without any credibility or substance. It is factually acurate and as such (and in compliance with Wikipedia Rules) SHOULD BE PUBLISHED. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Carolrubensteinesq (
talk •
contribs)
23:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Bwahahahaaahaahaaa. Oh my. I'd ask for a block based on the volume of quacking in the vicinity, but this could turn out to be very funny. //
roux03:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)reply
I've added her to the increasingly long and (dare I say) hilarious list of possible Pprice1 sockpuppets. Anybody here got checkuser access? --
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
06:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Mr. Vernon I am a member of the New York, Michigan and California Bar and now you are crossing the line. I plan to subpoena Wilkipedia as to your information because you have committed a major error in your accusation which is actionable in a civil suit. In the spirit of the New Year I will settle for a apology on this page asap.
--
Carolrubensteinesq (
talk)
05:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)reply
It is amazing how badly informed Carolrubenstein is for a lawyer! Almost makes you think maybe she isn't one. Or that you yanks aren't clearing your lawyers properly :P.
Ironholds (
talk)
07:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete; the screed at the top of it is not helping. I'm not sure if the account creating this drek is a lawyer or not (my money is on (s)he is not), but in any case, someone needs to point the main account towards the relevant policies (
WP:Notability,
WP:No legal threats,
WP:Spam) and block all involved accounts until the hangover wears off on Jan. 3rd. Remember, kiddies, bar has
more than one meaning! -JéskéCouriano(
v^_^v)12:38, 1 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete Wikipedia is not a place for advertising or promotion, since the content is almost certainly going to be deleted through AfD it has no encyclopedic value. Hut 8.513:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I am a in house counsel for Paramount and am fully aware of Mr. Scott Walterschied. How this article is advertising or spam asserted by these 2 users asking for it's deletion, is without any credibility or substance. It is factually acurate and as such (and in compliance with Wikipedia Rules) SHOULD BE PUBLISHED. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Carolrubensteinesq (
talk •
contribs)
23:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Bwahahahaaahaahaaa. Oh my. I'd ask for a block based on the volume of quacking in the vicinity, but this could turn out to be very funny. //
roux03:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)reply
I've added her to the increasingly long and (dare I say) hilarious list of possible Pprice1 sockpuppets. Anybody here got checkuser access? --
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
06:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Mr. Vernon I am a member of the New York, Michigan and California Bar and now you are crossing the line. I plan to subpoena Wilkipedia as to your information because you have committed a major error in your accusation which is actionable in a civil suit. In the spirit of the New Year I will settle for a apology on this page asap.
--
Carolrubensteinesq (
talk)
05:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)reply
It is amazing how badly informed Carolrubenstein is for a lawyer! Almost makes you think maybe she isn't one. Or that you yanks aren't clearing your lawyers properly :P.
Ironholds (
talk)
07:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete; the screed at the top of it is not helping. I'm not sure if the account creating this drek is a lawyer or not (my money is on (s)he is not), but in any case, someone needs to point the main account towards the relevant policies (
WP:Notability,
WP:No legal threats,
WP:Spam) and block all involved accounts until the hangover wears off on Jan. 3rd. Remember, kiddies, bar has
more than one meaning! -JéskéCouriano(
v^_^v)12:38, 1 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete Wikipedia is not a place for advertising or promotion, since the content is almost certainly going to be deleted through AfD it has no encyclopedic value. Hut 8.513:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.