From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Xoloz 16:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply

User:Feedyourfeet/Zazz

Userfied for rework after deletion per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zazz and subsequent DRV but not being worked on. Just zis Guy you know? 14:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. In my opinion, if a user asks for content to be restored, they should start work on it immediately (if they're not going to, then they should ask for restoration when they intend to start). The user now has eight days to copy it into Notepad, where they can work on it offline to their heart's content anyway. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 23:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  • It's only been 3 weeks so far. Be patient. It is vacation season after all and people do have lives outside Wikipedia. Keep for now but I'll change my mind if it's still in the same shape in 3 months. Rossami (talk) 17:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Keep until early September.-- Runcorn 21:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  • keep vacation season, per Rossami and Runcorn. c.  tales  *talk* 04:37, 13 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Xoloz 16:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply

User:Feedyourfeet/Zazz

Userfied for rework after deletion per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zazz and subsequent DRV but not being worked on. Just zis Guy you know? 14:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. In my opinion, if a user asks for content to be restored, they should start work on it immediately (if they're not going to, then they should ask for restoration when they intend to start). The user now has eight days to copy it into Notepad, where they can work on it offline to their heart's content anyway. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 23:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  • It's only been 3 weeks so far. Be patient. It is vacation season after all and people do have lives outside Wikipedia. Keep for now but I'll change my mind if it's still in the same shape in 3 months. Rossami (talk) 17:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Keep until early September.-- Runcorn 21:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  • keep vacation season, per Rossami and Runcorn. c.  tales  *talk* 04:37, 13 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook