- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Spartaz Humbug! 16:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Another abandoned userspace draft article. Editor last edited it on March 2009 and has not been active since May 2009. — Farix ( t | c) 01:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Abandoned draft of an inactive user. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 01:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per above, without prejudice. The user should always be able to get this back if he asks. MER-C 03:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per Farix's reasoning. Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 04:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep It isn't indexed, and isn't creating any harm. Far too soon to conclude that this user will never return.-- SPhilbrick T 16:02, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete and why not? There's always undeletion. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 01:26, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Blank - there appears to be significant history to this page unrelated to its current contents, which really isn't unusual for article sandboxes in userspace. I see no reason to delete that history for the sake of the page's current contents, and believe blanking will achieve the same, intended effect as deletion. 「 ダイノガイ 千？！」 ? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 04:28, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as mentioned above, without prejudice. User was an established editor with apparently a good history, but he seems to have walked away from the project and user subpages are not supposed to be indefinite. If it does get deleted, I would suggest leaving a note on the user talk page specifically explaining that he's welcome to get it undeleted if/when he returns. Matt Deres ( talk) 15:25, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Spartaz Humbug! 16:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Another abandoned userspace draft article. Editor last edited it on March 2009 and has not been active since May 2009. — Farix ( t | c) 01:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Abandoned draft of an inactive user. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 01:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per above, without prejudice. The user should always be able to get this back if he asks. MER-C 03:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per Farix's reasoning. Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 04:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep It isn't indexed, and isn't creating any harm. Far too soon to conclude that this user will never return.-- SPhilbrick T 16:02, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete and why not? There's always undeletion. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 01:26, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Blank - there appears to be significant history to this page unrelated to its current contents, which really isn't unusual for article sandboxes in userspace. I see no reason to delete that history for the sake of the page's current contents, and believe blanking will achieve the same, intended effect as deletion. 「 ダイノガイ 千？！」 ? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 04:28, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as mentioned above, without prejudice. User was an established editor with apparently a good history, but he seems to have walked away from the project and user subpages are not supposed to be indefinite. If it does get deleted, I would suggest leaving a note on the user talk page specifically explaining that he's welcome to get it undeleted if/when he returns. Matt Deres ( talk) 15:25, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.