The result of the discussion was Delete something lame from CBW 08:40, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
This was deleted as a main space article pursuant to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A trigonometric identity for a circulant matrix. There's been a back-and-forth on making this available to the user here to take with him, though the person who did that acknowledged that he certainly already has it at home. The author himself has already blanked it once, but now has restored it. I'm getting the impression that, having been told that the proof can't be an article, he is continuing to take advantage of Wikipedia's math formatting capabilities for his own personal purposes; in any event, he isn't using this page to serve any Wikipedia-related purpose. At no time has the author responded to any of the actions taken or to any communications made to him, so any sign of cooperative, collaborative intention on his part is absent. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 13:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete something lame from CBW 08:40, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
This was deleted as a main space article pursuant to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A trigonometric identity for a circulant matrix. There's been a back-and-forth on making this available to the user here to take with him, though the person who did that acknowledged that he certainly already has it at home. The author himself has already blanked it once, but now has restored it. I'm getting the impression that, having been told that the proof can't be an article, he is continuing to take advantage of Wikipedia's math formatting capabilities for his own personal purposes; in any event, he isn't using this page to serve any Wikipedia-related purpose. At no time has the author responded to any of the actions taken or to any communications made to him, so any sign of cooperative, collaborative intention on his part is absent. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 13:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)